ApexVIII
15+ Year Contributor
- 812
- 5
- Jan 12, 2008
-
Modesto,
California
nice work! im stoked to see how it works out!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
No, I'll be able to measure the work of each turbo my using two boost gauges (already mentioned this somewhere in this thread). I already have them in the dash. One will measure at the outlet of the 60-1 and the other will measure manifold pressure. And yes, I will have to do a bit of math to figure the 16g's individual output, but it's pretty simple stuff.
94awdcoupe - Quit posting about how things WILL work and problems that WILL occur. You're passing your theory off as fact and it's rather annoying. Unless you can show me how YOU'VE done this before and how it worked out for YOU.

Even if the setup only makes 300hp, it would have a crazy torque and hp curve, or should I say line...
Yes, most definitely.Since the bigger turbo is feeding the smaller then it is safe to assume it would build up pressure in the pipe between the inlet and outlet.
I'm not sure if it works that way. But even if it did, I'd bet that the 'draw' of the B16G is less than 1 in/hg. Interesting point though.Do you think it is possible that the output in that pipe may be lower than the actual output of the turbo since the other is drawing in air ? It would seem to me that there would be some pressure drop equal to the work / draw of the smaller.
It's my understanding that the majority of the work being done is the smaller turbo re-compressing the larger turbo's air charge. This is how the final air charge becomes so dense (basically more mass in the same volume). I'm not 100% sure what the lbs/min output is going to be in relation to another type of set-up.Is it necessary for the smaller turbo to recompress the largers air ? Or would the final lbs/min be the same if they fed the motor like a twin setup ?
^^^ Yup, pretty much.
These Kelfords are going to kick some ass. I sent the 272 specs over to my buddy who did my cylinder head work, and he said they should perform very well. Did you ever figure out which springs you're going with?
You forgot the emoticon.so my funny didn't even get a laugh... why so serious


Headed out to the garage right now. I'll have updates tonight. Will be firing it up on Tuesday probably.Any updates?
You must be logged in to view this image or video.

That's an sequential setup not a compound