DreamChaser7
Supporting VIP
- 1,248
- 1,629
- Jul 18, 2019
-
Valrico,
Florida
Minimal framing and some visqueen…(that’s poly for you yanks) I can say that cuz I’m from Maine. 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.


The switch from MAF to SD can give similar results, as I switch back to MAF for SMOG testing with minimal changes. Most of the pain is related to finding the sweet spot in closed loop so that LT and ST fuel trims hover around 0% using fuel pressure and dead times.Alright well everyone I've asked for help with speed density has ignored me, so I just switched back to the MAF sensor. Fired right up, idles and revs perfect, nothing to chase or hunt down. I'm just gonna stick with MAF until it becomes a restriction or headache.
Probably honestly gonna stop updating this thread too and just make a private record on my own so I don't spam the forums anymore. Give other people a chance to build their thread up.
Appreciate the input from everyone. Good luck everybody.
Don't get down on SD, it's a bit of a struggle sometimes. I find it brings out weirdness on your motor and VE than mass air does. Mass air is like.. entire tenths of the VE table all averaged together. SDs ability to isolate 500rpm vs 3psi or so is what makes it so special.Alright well everyone I've asked for help with speed density has ignored me, so I just switched back to the MAF sensor. Fired right up, idles and revs perfect, nothing to chase or hunt down. I'm just gonna stick with MAF until it becomes a restriction or headache.
Probably honestly gonna stop updating this thread too and just make a private record on my own so I don't spam the forums anymore. Give other people a chance to build their thread up.
Appreciate the input from everyone. Good luck everybody.
Probably honestly gonna stop updating this thread too and just make a private record on my own so I don't spam the forums anymore. Give other people a chance to build their thread up.
Looks like he's been active recently over in the FB group. That's too bad.He hasn't been on since 7/9...
You mentioned in https://www.dsmtuners.com/threads/altered-mental-status-1g-awd-5spd.542522/post-153920858 that regardless of turbo, you run basically an untouched SD table besides a bit of tweaks here or there.He said it in his last reply. "Alright well everyone I've asked for help with speed density has ignored me", which is referring to this thread on the 8th which didn't get replies until the 10th so in his eyes he was ignored even though it was 24 hours. Even more weird is I replied to him on the 9th like 5 posts up offering an answer, and additional info, and expressed interest on seeing a log.
Oh well. Looks like 7/9 he threw pity and on 8/29 the pity party is occurring.
Nope, that's just the way it ends up. Idle and cruise I leave alone, the only work done really is to be sure peak VE has a value of 100.You mentioned in https://www.dsmtuners.com/threads/altered-mental-status-1g-awd-5spd.542522/post-153920858 that regardless of turbo, you run basically an untouched SD table besides a bit of tweaks here or there.
If you change out the exhaust manifold, hot side (6cm vs 7cm vs 10cm), intake manifold, cams, etc., which I presume you're doing at least some of that when going from a 16g to a 6266, how does that not alter the VE of the engine even a noticeable amount?
A base SD table I would assume is built from a 1g/2g exhaust manifold, intake, and stock cams.. but the moment you're more free flowing, you should really be increasing VE with the ability to clear more exhaust out of the cylinders, no?
Legit questions.
This is all your fault.Aw, I didn't mean to imply that a SD specific thread is the only way to get SD feedback. This is the build thread - it goes here for sure.
Correct. The SD table values are a percentage of VE. There will be a point where it's at its peak, so a value of 100 is to be used there. Anything over 100 you'll for sure have over inflated values logged in 'link such as lb/min.If you have an over inflated VE table, as in 100+ values it means lb/per min numbers will also be inflated correct?
I can see idle and cruise being not much different between setups; you're not doing that much on double digit horsepower.Nope, that's just the way it ends up. Idle and cruise I leave alone, the only work done really is to be sure peak VE has a value of 100.
We were just talking the other day here about how much the ECU relies on airflow to be correct yet it's the most molested part when it comes to adjustments. People look at their 10 dollar afpr gauge and go yep, then put in the global fuel % and go yep, then it's a free for all on the airflow adjustments to make that work when in reality it should be the opposite.

, I think we’re all excited to try and continue to help you with your car, and I agree, if the maf is working, don’t fix something that ain’t broke