The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Triple Engine Mitsubishi Eclipse Three Engine Car Build part 17-1.jpg

Twin Engine Eclipse - Two Engine Car / Spinalsign5357 . Now three engines ... Triple Engine Eclipse

Twin engine 1995 Eclipse ... Now three engines .

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Triple Engine Eclipse build part 19 ...

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


You must be logged in to view this image or video.
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
Last edited:
Triple Engine Eclipse build part 21 ...

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


You must be logged in to view this image or video.
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
I have an employee I think he must be related to. When he’s done they should get together and implement my guys hydrogen/solar self sustaining perpetual engine.
On this forum, we obey the laws of thermodynamics.

Helps keep grease off tarp . Most primer , paint , and clear . I grease
Ok, I figured it was to provide buoyancy or something to counter the half ton of extra weight from the tubing.
So, was any engineering done on this or are you just winging it? Serious question.
 
On this forum, we obey the laws of thermodynamics.


Ok, I figured it was to provide buoyancy or something to counter the half ton of extra weight from the tubing.
So, was any engineering done on this or are you just winging it? Serious question.
You're looking for a lay-up . Anything can be knocked . A Lamborghini is great until you get a service bill . 90's and early 2000's throttle bodied vehicles are the most reliable , but ugly . Late mode cars are the prettiest , but all look the same , and are engineered to be design obsolescent after 7-10 years or shortly following warranty expiration with plastic everything and integrated electronics . Just enjoy the ride ... Daffy out
 
A layup to what?

Are you seriously comparing the welding of random pieces of scaffold and then a coating of grease on it to the amount of engineering that goes into a Lamborghini? 90s/2000s throttle bodied vehicles? What a peculiar reference.

You offer no context of this thing except low resolution pictures and no facts about how safe it actually is because the design and implementation is thoughtful. All of those welds and much of the reinforcement look suspect and I don't see how you'd possibly be able to insure this for the road or any track, so it must be for show only.

That's a perfectly fine goal if that's what it is.

Don't know, all we see is metal stuck together and covered in foam and grease with tennis balls attached.

You're posting pictures to a site to show off work which is very unorthodox (who doesn't love crazy builds?) but when when asked if you are actually thinking it out and performing the necessary engineering tasks to ensure that tubes of metal suddenly don't become launched projectiles, you get defensive. Think about that for a second.

At one point early on in one of the pictures/videos you had a fuel cell attached using ratchet straps. How could you not expect questions about competency after that?
 
A layup to what?

Are you seriously comparing the welding of random pieces of scaffold and then a coating of grease on it to the amount of engineering that goes into a Lamborghini? 90s/2000s throttle bodied vehicles? What a peculiar reference.

You offer no context of this thing except low resolution pictures and no facts about how safe it actually is because the design and implementation is thoughtful. All of those welds and much of the reinforcement look suspect and I don't see how you'd possibly be able to insure this for the road or any track, so it must be for show only.

That's a perfectly fine goal if that's what it is.

Don't know, all we see is metal stuck together and covered in foam and grease with tennis balls attached.

You're posting pictures to a site to show off work which is very unorthodox (who doesn't love crazy builds?) but when when asked if you are actually thinking it out and performing the necessary engineering tasks to ensure that tubes of metal suddenly don't become launched projectiles, you get defensive. Think about that for a second.

At one point early on in one of the pictures/videos you had a fuel cell attached using ratchet straps. How could you not expect questions about competency after that?
There's no show , I post updates to what I'm up to . Twist all you want , a Youtube search will show plenty of exo cars with less reinforcement than what I have at the track . Clearly this isn't a flex on right , quality , big budget , etc . " ... engineering tasks to ... " There's no ensure . Walk a tow yard that does police calls and witness " ensurement " . I see what you see ...
 
There's no show? All you're doing here is show. That's not a bad thing necessarily but additional explanation and some more meat would be great. It's unique, why not?
If there's a language barrier, that's understandable.

Twist?
You must be logged in to view this image or video.


Tracks have tech inspections. At least, the legit ones do. But throwing more metal tubes at it with no thought to the engineering and especially no FEM analysis (look it up) performed is not actually reinforcement. Once you get into multi-axle vehicles and multi-engine, each with different HP/TQ potentials and powerbands, design becomes even more important. Are they all open differentials? What's the capacity of fuel tank? How is it going to be protected from collision? Are you running multiple tanks? Multiple fuel pumps or a set of inlines? There's no information here so, yes, all you're doing is "show" even with the low res photos in zoom/crop.

If you want to weld stuff together to create something, go for it. It's a way to learn, provided you do learn and don't just keep repeating the same mistakes. The same can be said with golf.. mumblemumblemumble.
You don't need big budget. Hell, even FreeCAD does FEM, and it's free. It'll take a bit to learn but so does welding.

Not that I intend to go back to Florida but I don't want to read a post from @CrackedDSM that he responded to a call involving two tons of metal tubing impaling a group of nuns walking down the street (GTA2 reference, anyone?)
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
Last edited:
There's no show? All you're doing here is show. That's not a bad thing necessarily but additional explanation and some more meat would be great. It's unique, why not?
If there's a language barrier, that's understandable.

Twist?
You must be logged in to view this image or video.


Tracks have tech inspections. At least, the legit ones do. But throwing more metal tubes at it with no thought to the engineering and especially no FEM analysis (look it up) performed is not actually reinforcement. Once you get into multi-axle vehicles and multi-engine, each with different HP/TQ potentials and powerbands, design becomes even more important. Are they all open differentials? What's the capacity of fuel tank? How is it going to be protected from collision? Are you running multiple tanks? Multiple fuel pumps or a set of inlines? There's no information here so, yes, all you're doing is "show" even with the low res photos in zoom/crop.

If you want to weld stuff together to create something, go for it. It's a way to learn, provided you do learn and don't just keep repeating the same mistakes. The same can be said with golf.. mumblemumblemumble.
You don't need big budget. Hell, even FreeCAD does FEM, and it's free. It'll take a bit to learn but so does welding.

Not that I intend to go back to Florida but I don't want to read a post from @CrackedDSM that he responded to a call involving two tons of metal tubing impaling a group of nuns walking down the street (GTA2 reference, anyone?)


He lives in s**thole Florida....I mean to say, "basically new york but hot 24/7" Florida. I'm in real Florida, so there's no worries about that.


This all reminds me of the dude who tried to big block ford swap his 1G, and without bracing anything cut the firewall completely out of the car and just threw the engine in.
 
Oh, so I jinxed the build?

I've never even breathed near this thing, and thankfully so.

Go ahead and show us what it's made of. Not literally, but metaphorically. We know it's boogered up steel tubing but take it out when it's ready and show us how it runs.

Everyone's build is different. And that respectable. But I didn't jinx shit and that shouldn't be your excuse when it doesn't run like a properly built 2GNT.
 
No hype ... Baseline acceleration before going triple engine with two v6's , stock internals :
You must be logged in to view this image or video.

Prior fastest acceleration with two different engines , stock internals , 420a in front , and v6 in rear :
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top