TSITurbo95
Probationary Member
- 2,506
- 18
- Oct 26, 2009
-
Ohio,
Ohio
Is a 10an drain ok for a 20g?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
I'd go 360* if possible to prevent any chance of wheel damage from in/out play. You may look at it as an expense now, but if your rotating assembly gets wiped out because you cheaped out on a thrust system you're going to be kicking yourself.Is this thrust bearing setup worth it in your opinion or should i stick with stock?I will be sticking with this turbo for awhile and maxing it out at the strip.
http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/152694424-post9.htmlIs a -4 line off the OFH unrestriced to a BW S362 with a -12 drain ok to use?
Should be fine, but I'm a fan of OEM drain lines for MHI turbos. Zero chance of the drain kinking with an OEM line.Is a 10an drain ok for a 20g?
Not familiar- perhaps you were talking to someone else? And what is your question / concern?Justin, what can you tell me about the BW turbos that have the screw-in compressor wheels? I'm pretty sure I remember you saying something about them awhile ago but I don't remember specifically.
You need the steel plate that goes behind the compressor wheel as well as the compressor seal collar for a 16G, and you'll also need to have the center housing machined to accept the larger compressor.Justin, i know the backing is different on the 14b/16g. My cousin has a 14b, and i have all the pieces to just swap in the 16g compressor wheel. Is it as easy as i just explained or does something else need to change because of the flat backing on the 14b?
I know someone that got a S366 with a screw in compressor wheel and he doesn't know much about them.
Sort-of a catch 22 here.
A bad PCV valve will cause more oil to appear in the intake which isn't necessarily the fault of the turbo. A bad PCV can also cause an over-pressurizing of the crankcase which effects the turbo's ability to drain.
At the same time, a faulty turbo can allow boost pressure to enter the crankcase...also over-pressurizing the crankcase.
The only way to rule out the PCV is to get yourself a proper catch can which doesn't allow oil to make it's way back into the intake system no matter how worn your engine may be. This rules out the PCV system entirely, and allows you to isolate the turbo as the cause of the smoke.
The housing I'd recommend based on other results I've seen is the factory 12cm twin-scroll, although if you don't have a true twin-scroll manifold you'll be disappointed with it's performance and will probably be better-off with a .70 T3 Bullseye housing.Hey Justin I'm getting ready to install my 7 blade hx35 you rebuilt for me and decided I want to go with a twin scroll setup. What options do I have as far as the turbine housing for the 7 blade hx35? I still have the stock housing that came with it but was hoping there was an external WG housing available and possibly vband outlet? I have a 2.4 with 9.0 CR and plan on pushing the turbo to it's limits. Also car is 95% street drivin so quick spool is a top priority for me. Please recommend me a housing and pm me if you have one available.
The housing I'd recommend based on other results I've seen is the factory 12cm twin-scroll, although if you don't have a true twin-scroll manifold you'll be disappointed with it's performance and will probably be better-off with a .70 T3 Bullseye housing.
The housing I'd recommend based on other results I've seen is the factory 12cm twin-scroll, although if you don't have a true twin-scroll manifold you'll be disappointed with it's performance and will probably be better-off with a .70 T3 Bullseye housing.
Turnaround time obviously varies depending on how much is ahead of you when it arrives. A complete description of services is listed in the Freelance ad.Hey justin, I'm planning on getting my turbo rebuilt E316G very soon, I know you are a genius when it comes to anything with these turbo's just wondering what the usual turn around time would be? This car isn't my daily, but I don't like having it in a torn down un drivable condition for an extended period of time. Please Pm me with these details as well as pricing.
No idea. Do a little reasearch, PM some users...everyone seems to have different results- there is no one set spool across the board. I believe the biggest illustrated success of the full twin-scroll setup is Peeper's video showing 20psi at around 3K in the higher gears.Along these same lines what do you think of the .63 housings VS .70 in terms of spool up? I see Timsturbos has these available for $200. THe main downside I see is the 4 bolt downpipe flange. Although they do make 4bolt to V band adapters, assuming we have the space.
Holset HX40 Turbine housing T3 Garrett 4 bolt .63 A/R - eBay (item 160654713005 end time Oct-19-11 21:07:58 PDT)
No idea. Do a little reasearch, PM some users...everyone seems to have different results- there is no one set spool across the board. I believe the biggest illustrated success of the full twin-scroll setup is Peeper's video showing 20psi at around 3K in the higher gears.
I feel like that Tim's housing is a joke- we already have a .55 housing in DSM bolt-on form for guys who want spool and a .70 T3 housing with a nice V-band outlet for $200ish for guys who want flow- plus the option of going twin-scroll with the factory housing....why the hell would we want a smallish T3 housing that would be laggier than the bolt-on BEP unit but not flow as much as the T3 .70 or 12cm housings?
I've never had a HX35 on any of my cars, so I guess the answer would be no.I wasn't asking anyone to spout out specific RPM/boost numbers. Just wondering if you have had any experiance with them.
.63 is a Garrett-based housing spec. The next size up in Garrett's catalog is .82, so rightfully the .70 housing sold by BEP is already right in the middle-ground between spool and flow.I have done some research, not much information on the .63 housing, on DSM's anyway. I know my grandnational came with a .63 housing from the factory. With the 3.8 boost was instant. I'd think it might be a happy place for a 2.0.
Why would it be a joke? Something wrong with the quality? Wouldn't it have to be a middle ground between spool and peak power compared to the .55 and the .70?