Jake Hanhardt 9.20 @ 145 1.132 60' You have GOT to see this!

[kiggly]

Sorry, but you'll notice in the rear-view video the fully staged light never went off until your rear tires were through the beams. Anytime you see anything strange with the staging lights, it means there was a false or late trigger. What parts hang low on the car? Also, 9.2 at 145mph is possible, but you would have been a LOT faster at the 1/8th, like 122-123mph.

Regardless if I believe the timeslip or not, it was still a nice run.

Kevin

 

[prostreetdsmx1]

very well done bro. congratulations. Keep up the great work.

 

[DSMcamaro]

Awesome, just awesome. Was your dial in time a 12 something?

 

[TSIMonsteR]

btw, the car sounds amazing man!!

 

[Spoolin98]

One word, WOW...simply an awesome run... Congrats!

 

[evil_eagle]

Well after reading what Kiggly had to say about the stageing lights he is 100% correct. I didn't even bother to watch the lights till he mentioned it.

As all you may know at ANY track, your time does not start till BOTH pre stage and stage bulbs are off. If you watch the video from the rear you will see that the stage bulb did not go off till his rear tires were allready 30-40ft out past the stage bulb. His Time started when he was allready at the 30ft mark, in other words a running start. So that explains the 1.1 60ft. I would have to say it was more on the lines of a 1.4xx 60ft. and the ET should of been more along the lines of 9.50's. I knew somthing just did not add up to the MPH in the 1/8th mile and his 145mph traps. It is possiable, but not likely.

Still regardless, that was one hell of a pass and very clean one at that. Very good driving on Jake's part. Next time he goes out 40+lbs of boost is getting packed into the motor. Should be very interesting to see.

 

[GSTeclipse]

well ...I am still saying congrates on a clean pass for you reguardless if it was or was not a 1.1 60' you where still hauling ass

 

[olmytsi]

Very nice dashboard/interior!

 

[topstreet]

Jake M/Kiggly,

As much as I would like to say that it is and was what I thought... I am going to have to agree with you. On any accord, I am still very excited about dropping a 1/2 secondish off my previous time. With the excitement and the way things were adding up, it seemed like a possibility.

Also with the track prep last night... If it were going to happen, it would have been then. Lots of broken axles, wheel studs, rims flying up in the air ect. Even the AMS guys were there and with in their first launch Eric snapped the pinion in the rear diff. and destroyed a carbon fiber drive shaft.

Well there is only one thing to do... Crank the piss out of the boost get that low 1.4/1.3sec 60' and get a less disputeable time as good or better than this one!

Thanks guys for keeping your eyes open! To be honest... I am kinda glad, because I never thought I would be able to repeat that launch, and now I am a lot more optimistic about it.

Eitherway, Here is there other video I was talking about!

Side View **VIDEO**

Jake H

 

[solomontomb]

very nice. great job!

 

[KScivic]

Awesome runs...

 

[4SFED4]

Awesome run, outrageous 60ft, congrats.

What type of rear axles/diff are you running??

 

[gsxAWDdsm692]

R/T has nothing to do with 60' times...

haha woops...my bad...I've never been to the track.
being half asleep wouldn't of helped either.

 

[topstreet]

What type of rear axles/diff are you running??

Dynatrac 700 enixulator series Vacuum forged reverse 50 spline....




NO NO IM KIDDING!!!

Stock

 

[tstkl]

Congrats, nice to see another fast Jake. Im Jake, Evil Eagle is Jake, and your Jake. I guess Jakes are meant to have fast DSMs

yeah......RRRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTT

two jakes are fast and one is full of himself.... whoopdy friggin do

good job, always nice to see another fast dsm. I thought something was up when I watched that video. How much boost are you building off the line? Something about a huge turbo pulling an insane 60' always gets me thinking twice. Either way, I'd still like to see consistant 1.6's out of my car, so congradulations on betting the hell out of any 60' I might dream of putting down. And the trap speed was good too, so we know your making some serious power.

 

[Shearer]

Again, If there is a valid and explained reason why someone things this isnt so, I will listen. But I would rather it be more than it more than likely isnt, so... NO

Jake H

Sorry I came off short this morning, I had a million things going on and time was limited. Watching the video from that angle it just did not look like anything better than a 1.4 or 1.5 60'. I've seen a ton of 1.2-1.4 60's from that same angle and the difference is quite apparant. I noticed the staging bulb staying lit also, and as Kevin stated already that is your first hint something was astray.

I'd be willing to bet that was a 9.6-9.7 pass, by all means that is still frickin impressive!

 

[topstreet]

Thank you Shearer. I still think it was at most a 9.6 due to the fact I womped the 9.63 next to me with a similar start. Either way I will be making up for this error soon enough. By no means is my ace on the table.

I did say I would listen to a valid explanation and that would make sense. Either way, it is a guess at this point. In 3 passes I went from 1.7/1.8 60's to low 1.5s and who knows what that one was. (other runs in the day) I have trapped as high as 151 before and there have been some nice modifications since then.

50+ psi is in the near future as well as many faster runs with out any funky lights.

 

[02BLUR]

Holy cow!

 

[dyno_detour]

My jealousy ROARS its ugly head.

 

[tstkl]

Thank you Shearer. I still think it was at most a 9.6 due to the fact I womped the 9.63 next to me with a similar start.

but your r/t was different, so womping him would suggest you actually did run that good of a time. Unless the light staying on is what increased your r/t by so much, and therefore decreased your 60'. You know, if you frame by framed the videos, you could calculate the correct r/t and find your correct 60'. You just need to find out what the fps of the camera being used was, which can vary from frame to frame anyways . Just a suggestion.

 

[drewbird91]

Jake,
That is awesome that your getting the bugs worked out. Keep up the good work. You should give me a call when you go down the GLD again and I'd like to see this thing first hand. Or get a ride in it

Can anyone explain to me why the light/timing system did what it did?

 

[BOOSTIN21]

JAKE FTW!!! WOOT WOOT

nice to see you out and about jake, nice run. where are you at right now, i may need help this winter building something.

oh and this is Cullen by the way.

 

[TSIMonsteR]

yeah......RRRRRRRRRIIIIIIIIIIGGGGGGGGGGGHHHHHHHHHHTTTTTTT

two jakes are fast and one is full of himself.... whoopdy friggin do

Don't knock my inspiration man!!!

 

[Slippi84]

Yeah that is a bad ass car. I mean I kinda figured the 60ft wasn't a 1.2 or w/e not cause of the lights just because it looks like you did the old slip till you move then hammer it launch. Usualy when you see guys pulling un godly 60ft times they say who cares what breaks and just drop the hammer right out the gate and you see a sudden jerk and a squat not a roll then a jerk.



edit: In another thread about shep breakin his record again they stated he pulled 1.25 60ft just food for thought

 

[topstreet]

I guess the way I am going to be looking at its is that "give or take" We left very close to the same time and I was a decent amount of time ahead of him at the end. I have a longer incar video that shows him passing me way after I hit the breaks.

All im saying is that his time is a reference point. I will be heading to the track again very soon.

Thanks Cullen and Chris D.

Slippi: as much as it may look like it. I dont know any one who just dumps the clutch on a multi-disc setup. The faster you can get the drivetrain to catch up to your lauch RPM with out spinning or bogging is the whole idea. The guys that just seem to "dump" the clutch, just have there slip down really well. I am not sure if you have driven the Quarter Master clutch before but, there is NO slip. Meaning whatever tire speed you have is were the drivetrain to engine rpm you are going to have. Meaning if I dont slip it enough and the tires are only spinning fast enough to match about 5k rpm, and Im at 7k. It is going to bring the engine down or drivetrain up to match. In many cases this is where things break. In my case, the millisecond I hear the turbo increase rpm I can let of the clutch. I can imagine on a car with nytrous, it would be right about when you hit the spray.

Either way, Practice is what is going to get it done. I think some of the other guys here can give there experiences with solid engagment clutches and give another perspective on the launch.

Long story short, an ACT or RPS clutch assembley, regardless of how hard it seems to hit, you realize with on of these bad boys it still has a little slip to it. Ask Jake M what he thinks about in-gear/ decel.

Jake