tsiawdspeed
20+ Year Contributor
- 39
- 0
- Mar 29, 2002
-
Savage/Winona,
Minnesota
I was looking in a magazine and they said that Pacesetter made a header for the turbo. Does anyone know about the quality or performance of the header?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
That's exactly the problem. People have the DNP manifold and will swear that it's worth every penny. Nobody has this thing on a 4g63 yet and the people with the DNP manifold seem to want to find any reason possible to make themselves feel better about spending too much. Or maybe the mani just sucks. No one knows.Originally posted by coltboostin
... So anyone with it on the car like to step up to the plate?
...and take a damn compliment. You have a kick ass car; nice job.Originally posted by coltboostin
Sure that thing is the sexiest piece of machinery to hit your engine bay since the turbo sitting next to it...
)Originally posted by GS><
That jdm guy must have spent around 15k on all the shit he has on his car, So congradu-fuc|(ing-lations your my hero. I dont care if you have a small college budget or not there is no reason to spend that much money on a header, that is out of control, those people that charge that should be drug out into the street and shot. and that is about all that I have to say about that. PEACEJohn
Originally posted by GS><
those people that charge that should be drug out into the street and shot. and that is about all that I have to say about that. PEACE
John
Originally posted by GS><
we didnt do anything to the header except wrap it. We just arent knowledgeable of welding I realluy couldnt say how much faster that it spools up cause it isnt my car I havent even driven the car
My butt dyno is not in tune right now so i really couldnt tell you how much better it is but definatly much better then the ported 2g was.
Originally posted by coltboostin
Damn JDM, you are just a hater. I dont like people like you as much as I dont like the people that say "well my boy's got a hunda that would kill ur car, runs 10' son street tires" F-in Morons. You seem to be the kind of person to think if its not my car, it is just not the bomb. My car is the best think that ever drove on this earth. Well, thats not the case. Dont be a hater.
I sent that POS back after finding 'huge' weld berries inside the runners.
Originally posted by jdmawd
Good points so lets take some random owner comments into consideration. Lets compare the difference of opinion. Lets begain with reviews of the Pacesetter Header
1)
The welds on the other hand are horrible, they probably will not last long under high boost.
2)
the manifold tubes are not equal length, spool-up might be a problem.......
3)
Performance: Because I tune for knock counts and fuel/timing I tune more with my DSMlink then my EGT. This is all tuned at @ 24 PSI on 93 pump gas, 0 knock count and good timing. At idle, exhaust tones stayed the same. On boost/full throttle the exhaust had a very different sound, very mean sounding! Spool-up..... well.....well....well.....spool-up suffered big time. Before the new manifold I was hitting full boost (24psi) @ 4000rpm and now it hitting full boost @ 4600rpm. So on that note the new manifold will be coming off soon. DAMN....my work wasn't done.
4)
I bought the ceramic coated one and immediately the coating flaked off the as soon as the tubes got up to temp. STRIKE#1. #4 and #2 cylinder cracked around the weld on the head side after removing and reinstalling three times. STRIKE #3
Hello Pacesetter! This thing is garbage take it back.
Hello DN Performance send replacement header ASAP!
Now lets look at some random DNP Header reviews
1)
got one too and the quality of it looks great. Good looking welds and the flanges are nice and thick.
2)
No problems here. I have had it installed since around Christmas and my car is a daily driver. Still in perfect shape. It helps my L2R reach full spool by 3500 rpm, and that still with the shitty stock sidemount I/C.
3)
I got the DNP exhaust manifold and installed yesterday. The exhaust manifold is very well built and I do realize my spool time was about 300~400rpm faster.
4)
It's been on the car now for 1 full year at this time. No problems what so ever. No cracks, no leaks & no rust. I drive it everyday and love it.
5)
I have also had this on my car for 9 months now as a daily driver. Through winter, spring and all of summer. No problems whatsoever.
6)
Well, after struggling with the Pacesetter crap I bought a DN Performance header and for what I paid it's worth every cent. As for performance the car seems no different, but the spool time is shorter
In conclusion please don't make baseless comments on my points of view. I do lots of research on parts before I spend my hard earned money now.
Originally posted by Wobble
I dunno if youdidnt go back in read, have a short attention span.. or what...
but it HAS ALREADY BEEN ESTABLISHED!! that a 500+ doller header is better than a 120 doller one, so dont sweat the research on it..
as for the pace setter slowing spool slower than stock because the runners are not = lenght.. i find this hard to believe.. because the STOCK runners are ALL different lenghts.. none of them are the same, the pace setter one has 3 that are pretty close and 1 that is shorter...
dont get it.
Originally posted by coltboostin
The only person to compain of a slower spool was the guy that got his car tuned. maybe a case of poor tuning?