SpawnedX
Banned Member
- 4,016
- 56
- May 18, 2004
-
West Warwick,
Rhode Island
I agree with the sentiments on the e316g and the 14b. Especially the 14b, it's an amazing little turbo capable of 20+ PSI daily.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Mine is actually a clipped B16G. But that's why I asked which one he considers to be the primary. I've always considered the smaller turbo to be the primary because it's the one doing the most work, and the one feeding the engine, but some consider the primary to be the larger turbo. I don't know which one he was referring to.That post was directed to 94awdcoupe. Since he was saying he should get a smaller turbo thats more reliable or something like that.
"I would have used a smaller primary turbo" Thats what he said. But i asked, whats a smaller more efficient turbo than an e316g? Thats what turbo you used, right Paul?
i personally would love to run an either t25/evo3 16g setup with an hx35 or 40. That to me would be a very quick spooling powerhouse!
I've got to get it caged first in order to really use it at the track, but it should be a whole footload of fun Yeah, Justin had the clipped wheel laying around, and my 16g's wheel was toast, we we figured we'd try it out. I'm 98% sure that my next configuration will use a td05 20g with the 10cm2 T3 housing.Your 16g is clipped? I bet your setup would have a better powerband and still lose very little up top with a nonclipped td05h wheel. It's not like you're pushing the 16g hard. What PR is it running?
I think you should do a nonclipped 16g with your gt35r next. Better response all around with both turbos. Plus the gt35r will give more topend for sure. . . all my personal speculation.
I'm actually looking to do the Evo 9 turbo/Hx40 compound set up on my truck sometime next seasonI've got to get it caged first in order to really use it at the track, but it should be a whole footload of fun

Yeah, I've been on the fence about running another 16g or moving up to a 20g. I'm really not sure either way yet, but I do know that I'll be using the T3 housing as long as I stay with the td05 wheel. The 7cm housing is probably posing as some amount of restriction right now. I think a larger housing is in order to cope with the amount of exhaust energy exiting the head. I really wish I knew what my backpressure was in the exhaust manifold...I'm wondering if the small turbo would even need to be that large. You're not running the e3 16g at unusually high PRs. You probably would get a faster spool sticking with a 7cm^2 turbine housing. Likely, most of the gases by pass it when she's full song anyhow.
Yeah, I'm a bit worried about that too. I'm fearing that the only reason my drivetrain has held up thus far is because the clutch is slipping some. We'll find out soon enough I suppose...I hope your drivetrain holds up not just your clutch.

The larger compressor feeds the smaller one a higher atmosphere. This is how low-end power is achieved with copious amounts of airflow up top. If it were configured with the smaller compressor feeding the larger compressor, I'm sure the entire powerband would be later and lesser.So, why does the big turbo feed the little one. I dont understand that. From looking at the pics, i couldnt understand why its like that?
I think the 16g would be too small for a 42R. If I were using a 42R, I'd pair it with an HX35.If i thought my gt42 would fit in place of that 60-1 i probably would buy it. To be honest though the lag makes it fun and keeps shot from breaking.
Initially we were concerned with the amount of airflow the 7cm housing would flow with a standard, unclipped 05H turbine.Your 16g is clipped? I bet your setup would have a better powerband and still lose very little up top with a nonclipped td05h wheel. It's not like you're pushing the 16g hard.
Right, we had no idea what we were up against being that Paul's setup was the first of it's kind on a DSM. I've understood the compounding theory for a while but never understood how it would work using a turbine wheel and housing that struggles to flow 42-44lb/min under atmospheric conditions. I know that clipping normally robs a little spool in exchange for top-end flow, but I felt it was a much-needed trade off in order to gain the overall flow necessary for compounding.Without knowing back pressure relative to a typical setup, this is just a guessing game though, Jus. I BELIEVE you all are right. But I wonder. . .
At 45 psi I end up around 1.9 and 2.1.It would physically bolt up. You probably wouldn't be able to fit a radiator in front of it though, and I don't know if the compressor cover would clear the hood or not. And the downpipe would need to be remade.Yeah but Paul do you think physically a gt4294 would fit with yoru manifold setup you have?
It would physically bolt up. You probably wouldn't be able to fit a radiator in front of it though, and I don't know if the compressor cover would clear the hood or not. And the downpipe would need to be remade.