TrippleStar
Probationary Member
- 7
- 0
- Sep 4, 2002
Hello, kids. Here is the Official AWD or FWD? thread. All the hare-brained arguments about "rolling starts" and "top speed" and "deadly transfer cases" and "drivetrain losses" and the rest of the mis-guided "better" advice is right here.
It's recommended you just skip reading it. You already know which you want, and why. Still, it's a place to dump it all.
Let's start with this fine opener from 2002 (it really doesn't get much better):
newbie to DSMs here, whats AWD and FWD. just sold my civic hatchback and got my eclipse not to long ago and im still learing the dsm101 stuff.
It's recommended you just skip reading it. You already know which you want, and why. Still, it's a place to dump it all.
Let's start with this fine opener from 2002 (it really doesn't get much better):
newbie to DSMs here, whats AWD and FWD. just sold my civic hatchback and got my eclipse not to long ago and im still learing the dsm101 stuff.
. Then you'll have enough turbo after you grab third real good. . . I never do understand why fwd guys go for lag. Go for enough HP to catch up. This usually involves a more laggy turbo. But the lag isn't what helps unless you don't have the self-control not to floor it
. But simply put, lowering your car is better than stiffening the rear. Counteracting front to rear roll does more to keep the contact patch consistant than defending against weight transfer. Which is still important, but not as important as encouraging more weight to stay on the front tires.


watever bro, i guess asking for "anything im missing"?, is asking what to spend $400 on then right on thats what im asking. Didnt mean to offend you mullet
