Revolution
15+ Year Contributor
- 388
- 2
- Jan 19, 2004
-
toronto,
Ontario_Canada
No the power would not decrease , but inadvertadly increase considering that this N/A motor has already made 450 on the motor. Any true race car builder will state to build the engine like it was an N/A car. Start with the rotating mass ,get into forged rods, higher spec cams and work with fully building up the block and tranny befor you even start playing around with the turbo.
Because most dsmers arent building a race car the e316g is a perfect fit for their needs.
In regards to displacement , a turbo will flow an X amount of air per second, and yes a turbo depending on what "level" of tune the car is in - might become a restriction , but then again those standards might lead to f-1 caliber cars. The only difference in displacement is how much exhaust is being fed to the turbo at a given time . It's safe to say that a 2.3L will exhale X amount of gas vs. a 2L's Y amount of gas at a given amount of time. X being more gas then y.
Point being a turbo is their to use the spent gases from the engine to force more air into the cumbustion chamber hence equalling more power.
In regards to this "gt turbo" I would like to see how it would stalk up to weekly abuse any other normal turbo would see.
I wonder if their would be any shaft play after a certain amount of miles.
Can it hold psi from 10 unto 24 psi realiabely?
Their are alot of things I wont knock,, until I have first hand knowledge.
A turbo is a turbo and if it come's with a warrenty then maybe some one should try it and see for them selves.
I will state this though I highly doubt that the same materials will be used for the housing /blades making this ultimately an inferior clone to it's predoccessor the e316g.
I first read this thread because I was actually contimplating what could be a great new evo turbo.
So I asked myself what if you could use the evo 6.5 center section and mate it to a modified evo3 housing? hmm
Because most dsmers arent building a race car the e316g is a perfect fit for their needs.
In regards to displacement , a turbo will flow an X amount of air per second, and yes a turbo depending on what "level" of tune the car is in - might become a restriction , but then again those standards might lead to f-1 caliber cars. The only difference in displacement is how much exhaust is being fed to the turbo at a given time . It's safe to say that a 2.3L will exhale X amount of gas vs. a 2L's Y amount of gas at a given amount of time. X being more gas then y.
Point being a turbo is their to use the spent gases from the engine to force more air into the cumbustion chamber hence equalling more power.
In regards to this "gt turbo" I would like to see how it would stalk up to weekly abuse any other normal turbo would see.
I wonder if their would be any shaft play after a certain amount of miles.
Can it hold psi from 10 unto 24 psi realiabely?
Their are alot of things I wont knock,, until I have first hand knowledge.
A turbo is a turbo and if it come's with a warrenty then maybe some one should try it and see for them selves.
I will state this though I highly doubt that the same materials will be used for the housing /blades making this ultimately an inferior clone to it's predoccessor the e316g.
I first read this thread because I was actually contimplating what could be a great new evo turbo.
So I asked myself what if you could use the evo 6.5 center section and mate it to a modified evo3 housing? hmm