dsm-onster
DSM Wiseman
- 8,592
- 130
- Jul 11, 2004
-
Bloxom,
Virginia
"This car" . . . There's no actual indication of any car discussed in the quote to which you've refered
.
.Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
.http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/drag-strip/375634-talondave-goes-10-39-132-94-holset-hx40.html
***Edit: Not trying to peck a fight. . .I just couldn't resist myself. . . Still, will a setup that nets this with an aftermarket (non factory) housing and no sponsorship/shop backing get merrit it deserves?
O
You are crazy man! Bumping up this thread just to piss of the haters. For some reason when I saw this thread up top again first person I thought of bumping this thread was you with talondaves results. Made my night! hahaThe Turbo did what it should have done... Its a 35r sized turbo putting down 35r numbers... I really don't understand what the big deal is...
I can't wait to see talondave run a 9. That guy has broke a lot of parts and refuses to quit and I like that. 
Should have done WTF That turbo hasn't even been warmed upI can't wait to see talondave run a 9. That guy has broke a lot of parts and refuses to quit and I like that.
..I'm not sure what part of that simplistic post was over bearing, but yes. "SHOULD HAVE DONE" was the phrase used..
These numbers aren't new for turbos this size. Its what everyone expected them to do anyways. I'm not saying that the times themselves can't be perceived as impressive, they simply aren't surprising (to me at least)
The big deal is nobody thought a HX40 could make power until now. According to all of the haters, the HX40 was never a contender because it had no results and now that someone has finally put together a worthy package it's just "doing what it is supposed to". Go figure.The Turbo did what it should have done... Its a 35r sized turbo putting down 35r numbers... I really don't understand what the big deal is...
It is a large turbo but Dave's car is one of the first and one of the only HX40s in the 10s right now, he should be proud! Not to mention this car is almost full weight, not a tuna can. I am very impressed!
The big deal is nobody thought a HX40 could make power until now. According to all of the haters, the HX40 was never a contender because it had no results and now that someone has finally put together a worthy package it's just "doing what it is supposed to". Go figure.
The best part is that this specific HX40 is producing GT35R numbers and the whole package cost $100 less than a new Evo III 16G.
The amount of supporting mod ON TOP of that you'd need for the HX40 puts that number even farther out of the realm of the Evo3. For the price of what it will cost you to run a HX40Pro you could bolt on a used HTA68 and run similar times.If you want to put it that way, I've sold my own rebuilt Evo III's in the past for around $375, and the total cost of Dave's turbo once rebuilt was around $435. I initially bought the turbo as a core, the rebuild parts, and the turbine housing, so I know what I paid. That's about $60 more for a rebuilt turbo with 25+lb/min of additional airflow potential.I can go out pick up a Evo3 for $300 (I've picked em up for less before) *why compare it to a new Evo3 when the HX40s you are referring to aren't?*
Aside from freshening up Dave's engine over the winter, nothing else was changed. He's pretty much running the same setup he was running with the HX35 except now he has an engine that makes better use of the airflow the turbo is generating; and I'm sure if the HX35 was on the car today it would net E.T.'s much better than the 11.60 it ran last year on the whooped up stock 6-bolt that was in three different cars with roughly 139k on it.The amount of supporting mod ON TOP of that you'd need for the HX40 puts that number even farther out of the realm of the Evo3.
That's a bit of a stretch, don't you think? Sure English Racing is running 10.3's using a HTA68, but they also went 10.6 with an Evo III 16G on the same car...and that's not something that everyone can do. Don't make it seem like the additional 20lb/min the HX40 generates over the HTA68 is useless.For the price of what it will cost you to run a HX40Pro you could bolt on a used HTA68 and run similar times.
Honestly, Dave came to me in search of a turbo that would be reliable. He didn't give a SHIT about performance or brand initially, he was just sick of the money he was throwing away on SBR G50's, G60's, PTE's, and Turbonetics turbos that never made it past the 1000 mile mark. The one requirement was that it had to be journal bearing so it could be rebuildable in the event of a problem. He had a 30R variant on his car in the past and a failed rod bearing caused the turbo to stop making boost even with an inline filter, so that was $800 or so down the drain.Hype created by big talkers yet proven by some of the quietest guys of the bunch. Go figure. Some people talk about it. Some people make it happen and to that those guys definitely deserve their congrats as I have relayed to the both many times.
. Go find out what an hx5whatever can do. Make a record and be proud.
. Wild guesses right? That's all it is.I'm kind of playing it by ear. Which ever deal comes my way first, BW or Holset.
Those are quite the opposite end of the spectrum pricewise. You will NEVER find a BW turbo that still operates normally in the price range of what most Holsets are selling for. You want a BW with 75lb/min capability, you are gonna pay $1200+ for a new one. The used Holsets (the entire point of this debate is their price vs. performance) are going for $4-500. Trying to see which "deal" comes along first is like someone offering you the choice between a new $75,000 Skyline, or a $250,000 Ferrari. They both have very similar power/performance characteristics, but do you really wanna pay 3x the price for the same power/performance and the cheaper alternative?

. I've been around the block a few times.
You can barely find a USED HX52 for the same price of the even bigger S475 new.
I'm just saying, for future reference, either research the topic being discussed or the person you are mentioning it to. I've been around the block a few times.
![]()
The hx52 used can be had for a bit less than an s475 new. Have you contacted goldfarb in doing your own homework?. . . However yes, the s475 is in a different flow bracket; 66mm vs. 75mm inducer: 10+ lb/min. There seams to be a bubble in price as you go from 50-trim flows to 4088r flows. Then the prices seam to plain off or even go down. I would expect a very large turbo not to be so costly, s4** turbos being significantly larger than the hx5* turbos. Because you are getting out of the aftermarket demand.
...
Put her on and go fast




