HighPSI TSi Guy
20+ Year Contributor
- 1,212
- 11
- Nov 7, 2002
-
Fredericksburg,
Virginia
Kiggly Racing - kigglyracing.com
My "Dream build" has been a FWD auto setup. FWD has less drivetrain loss than AWD and weighs less. The downside of reduced traction is minimized by the auto trans, since you can pre-load the drivetrain and control the launch better. You'd obviously only want to do it on full slicks, but at the power levels they're running, traction shouldn't be an issue and I wouldn't be surprised to see them pick up some ET and MPH. Assuming they're already running welded center diffs, it would be very simple to try out and easy to revert back if it didn't work for them.
They make it look easy. It is not that simple. I don't think you realize how much power is pulled out of the high powered FWD cars to make them hook. I've built both. AWD/RWD always wins. Anything at 400+ whp will suffer from physics. You hardly gain any power from drivetrain differences. As I stated it's ~4% which I've found by converting cars and running them back to back on a dynojet on more than one occasion. At lucas' level he'd probably see 25whp from converting. That's worthless when you have to pull 50whp from the bottom half of the track to make it hook. Weight difference is ~100 lbs, less actually for an auto trans, since the FWD and AWD auto trans weigh damn near the same (unlike their 5 speed counterparts). I know this from doing AWD conversions on cars and weighing the cars and parts. When you make power, physics wins. Power to weight stops working when you are traction limited. That's why the hondas that go 8s have to go 20mph faster than us to do it. Even at the high 9 second level, I'm going 10.0s in a 3200 lb 600whp AWD sled while the 600whp tin can 2000 lb honda dragsters are struggling to stay ahead. That drivetrain gain and reduced weight sure is helping them out

I say F those tires and make em work for it.
