MrBoxx
Moderator
- 3,726
- 129
- Aug 19, 2005
-
Midland,
Michigan
Awesome run, Kevin. I'm proud to say I was there and saw that in person. It was great to see two RWD 1g's go up against each other. Congrats again!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
. At the end of the season I started playing with that, and went 10.31 at 132. I still want to revisit that, I'm pretty sure I could get to 9s now. 

. Much easier to pay someone else 100 bucks to use their track. But hey, someone's gotta do it. We'll turn it into something eventually. The community supports our effort and that's one of the most important things. The upside on the car is that it's ready to go fast, and for the first time in a long time I know what's holding it back, I just have to get it done. So there's hope.I can certainly relate to that perspective, believe me. Good for you for taking ownership of the track and keeping it available for the drag racing community.Much easier to pay someone else 100 bucks to use their track. But hey, someone's gotta do it. We'll turn it into something eventually. The community supports our effort and that's one of the most important things.

I put a stockish motor and a 16g back in it for some fun though. Most of that story is in the 16g discussion thread, but it ended up retaking the 16g record (no nitrous), which I last had in 2011, with a 10.24, last summer. As the temps dropped I worked that down to a 10.02 or so. I'm gonna keep trying for 9s before it warms up too much. The current setup is non-intercooled methanol, which has some pros and cons, but should be my best chance for 9s due to the lighter weight. This car is a little heavy for 16g shenanigans at ~2350 lbs. Then I may step up to the XR 6156 from the mighty max to see what that little guy will do, and/or do some goofy shit like 3 16Gs compounded. I do have another "good" motor being built, but I can't say when I'll get that back in the car with the bigger turbos. That setup has already made more than enough power to beat my 7.90 PB, the trick there will all be in the trans/converter.
I don't think there are many underside photos floating around for RWD DSMs. Your car is probably the one with most archived information for it here on the site (or anywhere online that can be easily found). The more images you have in your vehicle profile like that, the more beneficial it would be for the community.Now that you mention it, I've been meaning to get an underside pic. I get messages asking for certain details and I never have one. I have to move it out of the lift bay tomorrow, with any luck I'll remember to put it in the air and grab a picture first.
It's funny how small the 16g looks in there. It almost looks out of place with this type of build.

I was thinking the same thing.It looks almost photoshopped


This is how rumors get started... I can just see the posts over on FB - I heard some noob over on toonerz is going triple turboI think 3 of them would fill it out a little better.

Lol, all good points. There is a 90% chance this is going to happen though. It should run low 8s without too much trouble.
