AWDLATIN
20+ Year Contributor
- 483
- 0
- Nov 3, 2002
-
San Diego,
California
Liquid Illusion said:Interesting,
for some reason i just cant agree
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
That picture is just pure SEX
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Liquid Illusion said:Interesting,
for some reason i just cant agree
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
Liquid Illusion said:Interesting,
for some reason i just cant agree
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
14.5 drift said:I didn't want to bring back an old thread but how can I get one of these?
BTW your pm's are turned off.
Dieselboy said:That's exactly what I was planning on fab'n up myself! A custom WG dump using flanges to switch from externally dumped to a rerouted dump in minutes. Kind of sucks to see it's already been done, but cool at the same time.
RACER-X said:Ok and after a year and a half since JDM made this thread... do have any figures or runs at the track for this turbo?
what do you wanna know?Staytuned said:I would be interested in some more info on their 93 octane run ....damn 503 horse's.
No kidding! A 2.4 liter at 8200 rpms should be plumming around 60 lbs/min!Staytuned said:This turbo has to be under rated to pull those awesome #'s
NOSLO2PT0 said:
actually went back and looked again, with that displacement it should be more like 65 lbs/minStaytuned said:Ok now I really can't wait to get this car on the road.
I remember super95awd saying that he was flowing some serious air with this turbo also.
Staytuned said:Compressor wheel: 6 bladed 56 trim with a 2.25 in and a 3.00 ex.
Turbine wheel: 84 trim 2.16 ex and a 2.36 in.
definitiveno said:actually went back and looked again, with that displacement it should be more like 65 lbs/min