Car Cannibal
20+ Year Contributor
- 532
- 58
- Jun 7, 2003
-
Chicago,
Illinois
Jesus, you're all over the place Turboglen.
I admire your quest for power and wished you would've maxed out the no intercooler/meth injection setup before moving on multiple times. Though I can't blame you for going with E85 and an intercooler.
IMO, if you were to go M2 or M3 pre turbo water injection and then had two M15 nozzles running straight meth you would've achieved your low inlet temps and denser air charge, especially if you eventually went with a much larger turbo like a 61mm.
Meth will cool the charge more than water, the GN crowd proved this years ago and a few others on here have the theory to back that up.
I agree that using the water pre turbo might be an issue with the turbo blades in the long run, but it would help the turbo at higher psi make the charge denser and act like a slightly bigger turbo. And most of us change turbos every 30k miles anyways so who cares right?
And running no IC and pipes is a nice plus in spool up, weight and $$.
I admire your quest for power and wished you would've maxed out the no intercooler/meth injection setup before moving on multiple times. Though I can't blame you for going with E85 and an intercooler.
IMO, if you were to go M2 or M3 pre turbo water injection and then had two M15 nozzles running straight meth you would've achieved your low inlet temps and denser air charge, especially if you eventually went with a much larger turbo like a 61mm.
Meth will cool the charge more than water, the GN crowd proved this years ago and a few others on here have the theory to back that up.
I agree that using the water pre turbo might be an issue with the turbo blades in the long run, but it would help the turbo at higher psi make the charge denser and act like a slightly bigger turbo. And most of us change turbos every 30k miles anyways so who cares right?
And running no IC and pipes is a nice plus in spool up, weight and $$.