echostats
15+ Year Contributor
- 158
- 0
- Dec 7, 2004
-
Massillon,
Ohio
Getting it ready for the good motor? And I thought that was an amazing build... oh, little do I know. 

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

big ole hogged out runners that run straight into the side of the head and then make a 90 degree bend to enter the cylinder is efficient? Fact blue ballz on here made over 600whp with an untouched(runner) 2g head and made way more tq than a 1g head could produce. He broke the DSM tq record on Torque Freeks(not sure how they spell their shop name) dyno. The only thing that limits the 2g head in stock runner form is chocking out at higher than stock rev ranges.(or so I have been told).1gnasty said:well every one has a diferent opinion on the head but for the amount of boost u will be runninga 1g head will muve that volume of air more eficienly than the 2g onebut that is just me


If you are talking about bare metal cylinder heads and you say a 1g head is better than a 2g head then something is wrong with you. There is nothing worse about making the same hp if not a little more and way more tq. Also a properly ported 2g head will have 0 material taken from the floor of the runner.ian7321 said:A properly ported 2g will own a 1g head any day. The 2gs have more material that you can take out to perfect your flow, and also a stock vs stock comparison the 1g wins, just bc it flows more.
But a 2g head has much better shaped runners, flows at a higher velocity and with less turbulance.
-Ian

HighPsi91 said:There was a certain street driven Supra out there that dynoed something like 1500whp with a filled block. It was street driven, so that gives me a bit of hope.
Yeah you guys have such rough winters there.HighPsi91 said:I live in NM actually. The new motor was ready to be assembled untill I threw a monkey wrench in the plans by deciding against the filled block. I need to concentrate on making money for the next few months so I am not in a hurry. Plus, I have a 92 Laser I am throwing a 2.3 stroker together for so I will have a nice winter beater
HighPsi91 said:This motor was fully filled. I built a half filled motor a few years ago and that one worked out just fine. If your going to street drive and just have to have some fill to make you feel better I would recommend half filling, unless you want to sacrifice a motor trying a full fill like myself
I am pretty excited about the new motor. It should really help bring the GT42 to life. It has 10% more displacement, a bit more stroke, and a bit better rod/stroke ratio to top it all off. It should be about the best 4G6X based combo possible.. at least on paper.