ed1380
Supporting VIP
- 2,972
- 37
- Sep 29, 2007
-
ATL,
Georgia
Any reason not to use a composite exhaust gasket? I personally like then alot
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
This site may earn a commission from merchant
affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Any reason not to use a composite exhaust gasket? I personally like then alot
That is not going to be necessary I will just have to live with what happened. I was sent a pm saying that I cracked the manifold because I used the beaded copper gasket. It was explained to me that the manifold flange cracked because the bead on the copper gasket wouldn't let it sit flat on the head. I understand what is being said but IMO the manifold should have still pull the bead flat without cracking. It was suggested since its welded now to eliminate the copper gasket and use a mitsu 4 layer oem one. Okee do kee anything at this point until I get a new manifold. I was going to fabricate my 3" v-band down pipe off the ERL but now I have to wait for the new manifold inorder to do my exhaust completely because different manifolds sets the downpipe in different locations and there is not enough room when using 3" pipe to play with.
This is the only gasket that I have used with this manifold didn't have an issue until now. I measured the boss on the gasket and I must say that it doesn't fit around the exhaust port perfect nor does it fit inside the port perfect. It seems that the half of the gasket boss sit inside the port and half sit on the flange. If you look st the erl manifold there really isn't that much flange meat on the bottom therefore there is a small margin for the manifold to hit the gasket on the copper boss on the bottom side of manifold. This would cause the manifold to sit at odd position when mounted to the head. Look at the flange difference on the erl and this punishment racing manifold more meat on the punishment racing manifold at the bottom.Do they specify not using those gaskets on the site? If not, then the manufacturer would still be at fault. I mean how could you not add in the little fact that, the most commonly used dsm gasket will cause our mani to fail?
Im not sure how that could cause a problem anyway? As long as its torqued to spec. I've used the copper gaskets on several 1g and 2g ported cast manifolds. Never seen any signs of an issue from the gaskets.
I personally wouldn't eat the cost of two manifolds because of a manufacturers design flaws or poor build quality. FP's cast manifolds aren't cracking like that...
Sounds like you have options and a plan.
Keep us posted!
Bastard so do you think it will hold up for a minute?
Just wanted to drop in and express my sincere apology for the lack of follow through on the warranty from ERL. We always do our best to educate customers of potential pitfalls when modifying their cars but it impossible to be 100% perfect. Hopefully anyone looking to purchase this manifold can learn for your experience and avoid this same dilema.
I went ahead and added a disclaimer to the listing here - ERL Performance Cast Exhaust Manifold for DSM (T3 / T4 / Mitsubishi Turbochargers) - Modern Automotive Performance
Keltalon if you're in need of any further assistance I would appreciate you reaching out to me directly as I have no problem going to bat for a customer who has had a poor experience with any products we sell.
Thanks,
Dan Carey
Director of Sales and Marketing
[email protected]
763.545.3800x113
"If you're looking for an exhaust manifold for your T3 turbocharger that won't crack and is provisioned for an external wastegate off of the collector (like it should be!) then you are in the right place! In our opinion the range of flange options, quality of the casting, and price point make this the only logical choice for an exhaust manifold upgrade!"
Another thing that I don't understand is the drop down for the split collar. If you choose to not include it, it states (welding required). So what I'm getting out of this is that they are basically saying, if you don't use a 38mm eg with the split collar, your warranty is going to be void.I think map is seriously droppin the ball by not just eating this one, replacing your mani, or refunding your money, and THEN adding some more detailed disclaimers. It SHOULD be a learning experience but it shouldn't be at the cost of a customer. I think replacing one manifold for the customer is much less of a loss than losing a customers repeat biz, NOT TO MENTION all of us that are getting a really bitter taste in our mouths from MAP as we read this. And while yes, I DO feel that ERL should have been the FIRST to make it right, the bottom line is they DIDN'T, and from that point I feel it should be up to MAP to make it right for the customer because in the end, THEY chose to sell that product and put their trust in the quality and made the claim that it wouldn't crack on their website. They need to take care of their customer now and then seek reimbursement from ERL themselves. That's my opinion....
I'm glad i got a T3 mani on the cheap I was trying to hold out on one of these, but considering you are 1 out of who knows how many that have this manifold means that I'm not quite convinced that ERL is 100% at fault at this point.
IF you find other with the same issues, I'll eat my words i guess.
You bought it because their description said it wouldn't crack but it did and now they won't replace it? If that wasn't false advertisement I don't know what is.
Guess I should start selling Money Tree Seeds that grow real U.S. currency. And once my customers realize they don't really grow money I'll just say tough sh!t, I didn't make these seeds and edit the description.
Thanks for the post Kel. Im not just saying this, ive mentioned it in a few other posts: I WAS going to go with the ERL mani. I thought it was the best t3 mani out there and really liked the way the WG came off. But now??? You kidding me? I wouldnt touch it with a ten ft pole!! I feel bad for ya dude, what i bummer. Rest assured that no one who has read this thread will forget this.
Im sorry MAP, but i think you guys are dropping the ball on this one pretty bad. I say that being a customer of you and having bought atleast a few different things from you.
And the Mfr.?? ERL?? Theyre even worse, they are far more to blame in this situation. Damn Kel, im pissed for you at this point. Just wrong.... SMH at this shit
Edit: funny about that disclaimer suddenly showing up. But, atleast MAP is letting future customers know. Id like it to say:" Modifying in ANY way, INCLUDING EVEN THE WG FLANGE, will void the warranty"
Make it clear as day guys