The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Delta K272 impressions

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

BigBeans

10+ Year Contributor
1,423
29
Aug 16, 2009
I am in, Rhode Island
I've finally got my car reassembled and tuned halfway decent, so i thought i'd write a quick post about the Delta K272s i'm using, because i've seen several people ask about Delta cams. These are new billet cores ground with a profile similar to Kelford 272s.

First, as i found out the hard way, you need a lot of valvespring with these cams. I'm running the Ferrea Beehives and it's working well.

I have my cams degreed at -3 intake, +3 exhaust. The reduced overlap has given me a completely smooth idle, and helped eliminate some of the boggy feeling on the street. The car doesn't sound cammed at all. There's no "lope" really, just an occasional misfire at idle. This means the idle is relatively smooth in the car, which i like. It also means anyone listening to the car will not know it's cammed, and i like flying below the radar. With the cams set at 0 degrees the lope is very heavy, and driveability is simply awful on the street.


Driveability: It's OK. With the reduced overlap they are tolerable on the street, but the motor is still very dead in the low RPMs. Below 2000, the motor chugs a bit if there is any real load/throttle. From 2000-2500 it smooths out, but will not make any power at all. At 3000rpm, it finally starts to come to life a bit. Highway passing isn't an issue, but it's certainly not going to surprise you with off boost torque. I can live with it, but off boost it is very weak. It feels entirely different than my last cam setup, which was HKS 264/272, a fantastic combo for driveability. Of course, i expected this so it's no issue.

Flow: I'm using an FP3052, tuned at 25psi on pump gas. I had meth issues when we were dyno tuning, so i haven't started playing with that yet. I'm also using a JMF race manifold, well ported head, FP exhaust mani, FP 2.5" O2 housing into a 3" catless exhaust. The setup is flowing50lbs/min by 7,000rpm, and 52lbs/min at 7800rpm, both at 25psi. For a turbo rated at 52lbs, these are awesome numbers, and exactly what i was aiming for with the setup. The turbo is close to maxed out. I'll go up on the boost to increase midrange torque, but it'll taper off and i'll see similar flow up top. These cams definitely breathe :thumb:

The torque curve is essentially a straight line from full boost at 4500, all the way to 7000, where it begins to taper slightly. This means the motor is a top end screamer, as a flat tq curve means the horsepower curve climbs quickly with rpm. Peak TQ comes at 6000, and peak horsepower was at 7300.


I haven't started playing with the tune yet, but i have a feeling that the tuner pulled a ton of ignition timing based on phantom knock, so power isn't where it should be. If that's not the case, than i have some issue causing the car to knock with very low timing (8*). I'll know soon enough.
 
Below 2000, the motor chugs a bit if there is any real load/throttle. From 2000-2500 it smooths out, but will not make any power at all. At 3000rpm, it finally starts to come to life a bit.

thats the price you pay for bigger cams. adding some extra timing at 2k might help that boggy feeling i know on my car on E85 i add lots of timing down low and it makes a big difference in part/low throttle areas
 
I'm running the K272's. I liked my milder BC272's better, better driveability, better spool. It just traded some torque for some hp. I switched cams when I was on a 16G, and the car wasn't nearly as fun to drive cause that huge torque hit was smoothened out. Also, with the BC272's I could launch easily at 4 grand, with the K272's it bogs even at 5 grand (I have to launch at 5500).

My rings are shot (only have 110psi of compression), so after I rebuild the engine the driveablility with large cams will probably improve quite a bit.
 
I'm running the K272's. I liked my milder BC272's better, better driveability, better spool. It just traded some torque for some hp. I switched cams when I was on a 16G, and the car wasn't nearly as fun to drive cause that huge torque hit was smoothened out. Also, with the BC272's I could launch easily at 4 grand, with the K272's it bogs even at 5 grand (I have to launch at 5500).

My rings are shot (only have 110psi of compression), so after I rebuild the engine the driveablility with large cams will probably improve quite a bit.

How do you have the K272s timed?

With the cams at 0 my compression number PLUMMETED thanks to the bigger cams. I was seeing 190 psi on the HKS cams, and like 120 after.

I haven't retested since i changed the cam timing, but i bet it's much different. Also the driveability got much better when i reduced the overlap. It's still not great, but it's a lot better.
 
I think the degreeing of the cams has something to do with the poor driveability. What are the specs of the cams? I know not all cams are created equal, I had the old school GSC 272s on my Evo 8 Non-Mivec

i had mine set at ex. -4/ in.-1. Idle was a little loping but not bad

i hit 33 psi by 3500 RPM, and held 25 till 7500

I'll be installing GSC's new revised S2 cams (intake 11.2 lift w/ 274 duration and exhaust 11.0 lift w/ 274 duration) with a Evo III turbo to prove this whole "loss in spool/low end power theory" to rest. Granted extreme cams with huge lift and long duration will lose spool and low end power. But 272s aren't big enough for this to happen. Period.
 
Last edited:
^I can't wait, but the price range of those is within line with teh Kelford 272s, the reason these Delta K272s are so popular is of course the lower price.
 
I'll be installing GSC's new revised S2 cams (intake 11.2 lift w/ 274 duration and exhaust 11.0 lift w/ 274 duration) with a Evo III turbo to prove this whole "loss in spool/low end power theory" to rest.

There's no theory to put to rest. Bigger duration, more overlap, and you WILL see reduced bottom end power and higher spool rpm. If you change the way they are degreed to decrease the overlap, you'll increase low rpm efficiency, which helps bottom end and spool time. So if you're planning on throwing S2s with retarded intake and advanced exhaust timing on your car and claiming you disproved physics, you might want to rethink things.


Granted extreme cams with huge lift and long duration will lose spool and low end power. But 272s aren't big enough for this to happen. Period.

As jrohner already pointed out, K272s have more real duration than some 288s. They use an accelerated ramp rate, so the advertised duration is only 272, but the duration from 1mm is comparable to much bigger cams.
 
These 272's are as big or bigger than some 288's.

As I said before not all "272" cams are created equal.


There's no theory to put to rest. Bigger duration, more overlap, and you WILL see reduced bottom end power and higher spool rpm. If you change the way they are degreed to decrease the overlap, you'll increase low rpm efficiency, which helps bottom end and spool time. So if you're planning on throwing S2s with retarded intake and advanced exhaust timing on your car and claiming you disproved physics, you might want to rethink things.

I will be experimenting with all sorts of different cam settings, to find the optimal settings.

Lastly, I would like to say I'm sorry for coming off like a dick. I'm just real short with people and stubborn in my way of thinking. :banghead:
 
Lastly, I would like to say I'm sorry for coming off like a dick. I'm just real short with people and stubborn in my way of thinking. :banghead:

No worries. You def came across the wrong way in your post, but that happens on the web. :)
 
Where can you go to order these bad boys?

Just call this number and they'll take care of you. They offer a few different 272s, so if you want the monsters ask for K272s.

Make sure you've got some serious valve springs. I've got the bent valves to prove how necessary they are with these cams.

Delta Camshaft

Phone: (800) 562-5500
 
Mind telling what you paid for them? Im in the planning stages of a "major" build. Im definitely getting the bad boys with the big boy valvetrain setup
 
Mind telling what you paid for them? Im in the planning stages of a "major" build. Im definitely getting the bad boys with the big boy valvetrain setup

PM'd
 
I'm running the K272's. I liked my milder BC272's better, better driveability, better spool. It just traded some torque for some hp. I switched cams when I was on a 16G, and the car wasn't nearly as fun to drive cause that huge torque hit was smoothened out. Also, with the BC272's I could launch easily at 4 grand, with the K272's it bogs even at 5 grand (I have to launch at 5500).

My rings are shot (only have 110psi of compression), so after I rebuild the engine the driveablility with large cams will probably improve quite a bit.

I did a cam test of various cams and I must agree with you that the bc272s are awesome. I traded a set of b280s for a set of bc 272s. The bc272s had same spool charateristics of my old hks264s. I had to set them at 5 degree retard on intake and advance 5 degrees on the exhaust to get them in the sweet spot.
 
I cant wait to get my 272 cams. Just gotta wait till I'm done with vacation and they will be in my carI want my car to sound like its cammed and to be able to drive smooth when I'm just driving and not getting on it.
 
I'm running the new gsc s2 cam's. While currently still not running. I did just finished helping my friend get his 91 running with the gsc s2's. I have to say they are installed straight up and idle is great I'm surprised with the minor lope at idle while vacuum did come up a bit around 12-14 they are great cams. Decent drive-ability on his 68-hta I'm glad in my choice (I will be on a 20g)
 
Seems this thread isn't to old, so I'm wondering (BigBeans), if you happen to have the cam card for them (or know the specs) for the cam? I'm looking for lift (total valve opening or lobe lift off center line) and duration (at 0.050 preferably)?
 
If I remember correctly, the K272 is Delta's clone of the Kelford 272. You can find spec sheets on Kelford's website.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top