JusMX141
Moderator
- 15,147
- 1,287
- Dec 13, 2005
-
Greensburg,
Pennsylvania
While we saw as much as 8 or 9 more lb/min than yours at the same boost level, the fact that the power "leveled off" on top end tells me it's 100% the fault of the turbine housing and not the turbo. The turbo itself was doing exactly what we wanted it to.Thats too bad justin that you didn't get the gains you wanted, i didn't feel i was getting too much farther with mine at 67lb per min on a calibrated SD setup. At 38psi
Figure for a .70 T3-flanged turbine housing to have run an 8.7 with all other turbos having T3 .82 or giant twin-scroll T4 housings is pretty impressive nonetheless. It will be remedied this season for sure.
). Since they already have HX5x and HX40 designs, it should be relatively simple for them to adapt and build the 67/99 or anything else you may desire. Overall height on their performance HX40's and OE design HX50's are the same. Obviously, differences in bore diameter and hub nose diameter. Less obvious, tip heights are different. Still don't think it should be difficult for them to either scale up the HX40 inducer to match Hx50 specs or modify a 50 design.