brads
DSM Wiseman
- 860
- 122
- Oct 24, 2002
-
Alta Loma,
California
Originally posted by Groomz
I don't have much tuning experience first hand, so I plan to go the more travel S-AFC route until I get some real tuning experience, then someday I'll either get an AEM EMS or the DSMlink.
Lack of tuning experience is not a good reason to not get dsmlink. The fact that you don't have to worry about your fuel and timing adjustments being tied together like they are on an AFC make tuning with DSMLink much simpler. When you adjust the fuel sliders, you are adjusting at WOT only, letting the closed loop behave like normal, as it should. With an AFC, when you start playing with the settings, you have to worry about whether its happening in closed loop or not, and how this is going to affect your fuel trims. And you can see much more of what the ECU is doing with DSMLink than you can with a regular logger.
It's much easier to install, and the cost of DSMLink vs dsmchips+SAFC+logger is relatively close, especially if you add in that you would need an AFPR, or 1G CAS, or ITC, or something along those lines to try to adjust your timing seperately from your fuel with the AFC piggyback route. Both dsmlink, and the other route with a logger will require an eprom ECU and either a laptop or a Palm, so those costs are a wash.
If I was on a tight budget, knew I would not be upgrading my fuel injectors ever again, and didn't really care about trying to get the most performance out of my other mods, the dsmchips would be the way I would go. Or if I had a 1G, I would get a dsmchips chip, because its a good product. But trying to compare it+a piggyback to dsmlink just isn't a decent comparison. DSMLink is far superior in every respect.
Brad

dude how the hell did he convert the stock boost guage to knock??????? i want to do that!