6466, Evo 8 ecu 772/530 Mustang dyno

[BrokenTsi]

I just wanted to post my dyno graph on STM's mustang dyno.

quick mod list:
2.0 aluminum rod, wiseco 1400HD 9.0:1
6466 open T4, .96 housing
unported head, 1mm+ valves, ST duals, FP5R cams
Magnus V3, stock TB
Dragnfly T4 manifold, 1.25" runners
Race Components fuel system, 2200cc injectors, E85
42psi, falling to 39 due to wastegate springs being too soft.

Best [email protected] 150, 38psi best trap 154mph 38psi

First pull made 752, advanced intake cam 2*......772hp. (thats 900+ for you dynojet warriors )

I'm on a stock transmission, so I just sort of shift normal.

I've gone 121mph in the 1/8th a few times since the 9.6 run, but had some issues making it a good pass.

[ame]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aFNPdb7P0lw[/ame]

 

[99ECLIPSEGSXDSM]

That's badass man! Congrats

 

[907dsm]

Congrats Drew!! And great shifting because I know that transmission hates life .

 

[keltalon]

PTE line of turbo are just absolutely amazing! Awesome results, I have been hearing that the 6466 is a beast of a turbo spools like a 6266 and makes power like a 42r what more can you ask for keep up the good work

 

[Archer Fabrications]

42r what more can you ask for keep up the good work

An FP super 94? With a 67mm compressor and more top end then the 6766 even?

 

[LandSpeed-DSM]

Great numbers! The graph is a little blurry, where did you stop the pull?

.
.
.

PTE line of turbo are just absolutely amazing! Awesome results, I have been hearing that the 6466 is a beast of a turbo spools like a 6266 and makes power like a 42r what more can you ask for keep up the good work

An FP super 94? With a 67mm compressor and more top end then the 6766 even?

Quick! To the bandwagons!

 

[boost97gst]

Wouldnt the 94 be quite a bit laggier than the 6466? Im a PTE owner but soon to switch to FP(pretty sure i can get cheaper with FP), no bandwagon for me . Just curious.
If i had to pick between the 2 though, it would be the 6466. That turbo has had nothing but incredible reviews.

OP: Great numbers. Congrats

 

[keltalon]

Great numbers! The graph is a little blurry, where did you stop the pull?

.
.
.







Quick! To the bandwagons!

Well no bandwagon here I already run one and it's amazing!

 

[keltalon]

Wouldnt the 94 be quite a bit laggier than the 6466? Im a PTE owner but soon to switch to FP(pretty sure i can get cheaper with FP), no bandwagon for me . Just curious.
If i had to pick between the 2 though, it would be the 6466. That turbo has had nothing but incredible reviews.

OP: Great numbers. Congrats

Amen! !

 

[Kapok6]

nice run.

I am wondering how a stock trans is holding that kind of power.

 

[keltalon]

My experience with the pte 6266 CEA .82 bb vs comp 6467 .63 tbb comp 32psi pte 34psi. Pte bb units are just amazing! I am loving it when I was purchasing the 6266 the sales rep asked me several times you sure you don't want the 6466 instead I said I may upgrade later but as amazing as the 6466 is the smaller 6266 is judt perfect for me. Its good to see 6466 results

 

[____Kurt____]

Wow that's pretty impressive. How conservative is the tune on your car? Stm is the shop to go to, very happy with the tune Emery did on my car.

 

[Archer Fabrications]

Wouldnt the 94 be quite a bit laggier than the 6466? Im a PTE owner but soon to switch to FP(pretty sure i can get cheaper with FP), no bandwagon for me . Just curious.
If i had to pick between the 2 though, it would be the 6466. That turbo has had nothing but incredible reviews.

OP: Great numbers. Congrats

Yeah the 94 is a little laggier but it has more top end look at the boostin compairson.

 

[BrokenTsi]

Wow that's pretty impressive. How conservative is the tune on your car? Stm is the shop to go to, very happy with the tune Emery did on my car.

I only used the dyno at STM. My buddy at Mtuned convinced me to to put an Evo 8 ecu and helped me out with the tuning. The tune isn't conservative. My small runner manifold and unported head keeps me from making 800 at this boost level.

 

[BrokenTsi]

nice run.

I am wondering how a stock trans is holding that kind of power.

Unless its a PPG dogbox, all "built" transmissions are stock transmissions. Nobody can make the gears stronger. Its a stock rebuild by Raif @ RRT. Also, my car isn't that heavy. Maybe 2650 witout me in it. That really helps.

 

[BrokenTsi]

Great numbers! The graph is a little blurry, where did you stop the pull?

.
.
.







Quick! To the bandwagons!

I made the pull to 8500.

 

[BrokenTsi]

I will not be changing out this turbo for a very long time. I will run 8's next season on the 6466, just gotta change up a few things on the car.

STM's RS made 860 on 6766 at like...50psi. The 6466 has 6266 spool, and will make more power then 6766 until the 6466 is maxed out. I still got lots of room left.

 

[92GSXtacy]

How difficult was the Evo 8 ecu swap into your 1g? Simple patch harness? Or new sensors needed also?

Great numbers BTW!

 

[BrokenTsi]

How difficult was the Evo 8 ecu swap into your 1g? Simple patch harness? Or new sensors needed also?

Great numbers BTW!

Simple patch harness and for those who use a knock sensor, bolt in a 2g knock sensor.

 

[92GSXtacy]

Cool. Thanks!!!

 

[____Kurt____]

Pretty fast shifting. Wish I could bang my shep 4 Trans that fast. Also what is that whining after the pass?

 

[keltalon]

what is that whining after the pass?

I think that's the guys that lost the race

 

[danl]

Simple patch harness and for those who use a knock sensor, bolt in a 2g knock sensor.

Evo. 8 is the proper sensor to use...

 

[ceedawg]

Unless its a PPG dogbox, all "built" transmissions are stock transmissions. Nobody can make the gears stronger. Its a stock rebuild by Raif @ RRT. Also, my car isn't that heavy. Maybe 2650 witout me in it. That really helps.

Raif is the MAN!!!

 

[motomattx]

Are you using the 2g head and manifold then?