VenomPL
15+ Year Contributor
- 56
- 0
- Jul 6, 2004
-
Largo,
Florida
Who is the winner?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
And the money spent making the FWD get traction could have gone to the AWD as engine modifications, thereby making any AWD car faster than the equally well running FWD car with the same $$$ spend on mods.paranoidTSi said:Unless the FWD vehicle has a limited slip or some suspension modifications to get better traction the AWD will ALWAYS grab better with a proper driver.
boostaddictgsx said:Thank you, this thread was getting really annoying until that
foreverinvayne said:Grrr... if only, then we wouldn't have to worry about this whole AWD vs. FWD thing. IT'd be pointless then.
HAH!DSMeclipse4G63 said:I hope your not serious about beating your buddy...if so those are some tall words from a guy driving a stock car.

I guess they could have made some with only front hover pods, instead of front and rear hover pods. And according to some people, the ones with the FWH would be faster!boostaddictgsx said:and in 2015 in back to the future, all the hover cars were technically AWD, or AWH(all wheel hover) so GST's in the future wouldn't be able to fly!

leakyfaucet said:I guess they could have made some with only front hover pods, instead of front and rear hover pods. And according to some people, the ones with the FWH would be faster!
:laugh:leakyfaucet said:I guess they could have made some with only front hover pods, instead of front and rear hover pods. And according to some people, the ones with the FWH would be faster!
GSTs are cheaperleakyfaucet said:And the money spent making the FWD get traction could have gone to the AWD as engine modifications, thereby making any AWD car faster than the equally well running FWD car with the same $$$ spend on mods.
dev67 said:GSTs are cheaper
DoYuTurbo said:look people the GSX is faster hands down. now if a gst has like drag radials an a camber kit it could Beet the hell out of a gsx. but think about it, gst's under steer, gsx's don't so in the twistys the gsx wins. when it comes to 0-60,(not that I think 0-60 matters)but a gsx could bog down off the line if u don't no how to handle it. I have beet a gsx with my gst, but only when the other guy f##ks up. I would trade my fwd 4 a awd ina heart beat.
kpt4321 said:I don't really see how a camber kit is relevant.

Mackzero said:My car is far from stock I just haven't updated my sig.....
I have a bal. shaft elim. block, 1mm+ valves, full ported/polished head, MAFT/GM MAF, Denso 660s, FMIC, Supra Pump, Aeromotive FPR, SS lines, etc. Full 3" 02 elim exhaust-no cat, DSM Chip, PTE GT3255 turbo and suspension mods, etc. He should be no problem what so ever.....
. Yeah even from a roll youll get him...it is just a generalization, in corolation with an above post who was saying that GSTs need to buy traction mods, whereas that money could have been spent on engine mods on a GSX.foreverinvayne said:Depends on where you're from. Since you can't find either of them new now, they're all just gonna be based on what the used car dealerships want to sell them at or how much the previous owners wanna sell em at. And I have NEVER found a car that I was looking at that they were selling at the the blue book price from a private party. And most small dealers try to sell at way above blue book, and bigger dealers try to sell a little below blue book. So really, it just depends on who ur buying it from. Like me, I got my 90 AWD TSI with 125K miles for $1300. I saw a first gen eclipse for sale, a lil over 100k miles N/T for sale, the guy was asking like $2500 for it. Maybe a slight difference in exterior (in other car's favor) but I know my car has more luxuries (such as EVERYTHING offered, cd player, leather, wheels, a/c, cruise control, etc. and they all work perfectly)
So really, you can't say that for sure, just that they're SUPPOSED to be.

. I don't think it'll get up to 60 personally
.

boostaddictgsx said:OK, I now have hard evidence to back up the AWD standpoint, I just raced a Talon TSi FWD, and I kicked its ass, the car sounded like it had after market exhaust or something, but it wasn't 100% stock, whereas mine.....IS 100% stock. I beat it to 60 by like three car lengths, and that should put a cap on this on-going thread, as the original question is now answered with hard evidence.
BTW, my car is an auto!![]()

That adds insult to injury...boostaddictgsx said:BTW, my car is an auto!![]()
