Iowa99GST
10+ Year Contributor
- 142
- 1
- Apr 29, 2010
-
Des Moines,
Iowa
What's the difference? Pros & Cons?
Thanks guys.
Thanks guys.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Very true. But the only thing i was implying is that it is very possible to tune with a NB and it is in fact more then just a light show. You can aim for a specific volt reading the same as you would with afr's, you wont get the same resolution but close.
Completely off topic but im curious. Why are you logging with a palm and mmcd when you have link v3? I was under the impression link had cell tracking and all that fancy stuff with their logger?

But...that's not really true. NB sensors work by switching around a certain voltage, and the actual voltage they output is all over the place. Even by your own chart, my car could be off by up to 3 AFR points at any given time if I was to use NB voltage to calculate AFR. At over 30 psi of boost and E85, I'm usually tuning within .5 AFR points... A stock (and perfectly functioning) NB sensor would be completely useless if I want to maintain any sort of safety margin.
Just realized you were talking to me.
I haven't used them in forever really...just forgot to change my profile. I do occasionally plug the palm in to run MMCD though if I don't feel like lugging around the laptop, although it's been a while.
I have an adapter and power hardwired in for the palm, along with a custom mounting bracket. So it's really just a matter of swapping the plugs at the fuse panel to switch between MMCD and Link.
Toss on a different printed faceplate and you have 100% functional rice.


That almost made me spit soda at my work comp.

But...that's not really true. NB sensors work by switching around a certain voltage centered at stoich, and the actual voltage they output is all over the place. Even by your own chart, my car could be off by up to 5 or more AFR points at any given time if I was to use NB voltage to calculate AFR at WOT. Your chart shows an output voltage of .95 from an AFR of 10:1 to a little over 14:1. So how do you possibly shoot for a target of lets say 12:1 with that?
At over 30 psi of boost and E85, I'm usually tuning within .5 AFR points... A stock (and perfectly functioning) NB sensor would be completely useless.
I'm sure Calan would comment something close I wasn't speaking for him.
You have a serious problem... I'm not sure what it is but give it a break an Don't take what I say out of context...
THIS IS WAY off topic but either way I'll bite...
If you would like I can burn a chip right now with my chip burner W/ tunerpro then go out to my car an Run Speed density as it sits... ???
And if I was going that route for logging I would use a Ostrich with Tunerpro Rt not Jackel
What I do or anyone else does for engine management has nothing to do with this Thread... .
And this thread should have ended with post #16
Eh?
Let's re-evaluate this whole question, yet again...a million times over. Each time it is posted there is one person who will try to argue for the worth of a Christmas tree gauge...err narrowband.
OP, a narrowband is absolutely, 100% worthless, and in the "good ole days" people were tuning off EGT more than their pretty lights. This post is starting to become more and more of a "give me an excuse to be cheap" thread.
Isnt the thread called "narrowband vs wideband" ???
No reason for people to get hostile.

. I'm not looking for an "excuse to be cheap" Spawned, I honestly just didn't know what the differences were, or that Widebands were so much more beneficial. As I said, I bought the car with a NB and an SAFC II, didn't know if this set up would be comparable to a Wideband or not.Ah, I knew this thread would turn into a big argument. I'm not looking for an "excuse to be cheap" Spawned, I honestly just didn't know what the differences were, or that Widebands were so much more beneficial. As I said, I bought the car with a NB and an SAFC II, didn't know if this set up would be comparable to a Wideband or not.
Since the general consensus at this point is obviously that the WB is better, the next question that comes to mind is do I even need my SAFC II? And do I need link to make use of a WB, or is it just something that makes it even more worthwhile?
Thanks for all the quick responses.
Ah, I knew this thread would turn into a big argument. I'm not looking for an "excuse to be cheap" Spawned, I honestly just didn't know what the differences were, or that Widebands were so much more beneficial. As I said, I bought the car with a NB and an SAFC II, didn't know if this set up would be comparable to a Wideband or not.
Since the general consensus at this point is obviously that the WB is better, the next question that comes to mind is do I even need my SAFC II? And do I need link to make use of a WB, or is it just something that makes it even more worthwhile?
Thanks for all the quick responses.
I think you're confusing monitoring your engine with tuning. As mentioned ad nauseum, a narrow band gauge is pretty much useless for monitoring the AFR that you are running. A WB however will tell you exactly what AFR you are running.
The SAFC is a tuning device that will let you adjust your tune to get to a different AFR (to a point) depending on your setup.
So an SAFC would still be beneficial with the WB to tune the car, but can't you tune through link with a palm or a laptop?
I'm assuming that if this is the case the latter option would also be more accurate/easier to do as this is what I hear most people talk about. With that being said, do you need an SAFC with link, would there be any purpose for it?

Lmao sorry if I confused you, by link I was referring to DSMlink if that helps. I think you answered my question pretty much....
I knew an SAFC was a tuning device, didn't know how it stood up to DSMlink though, so then if I go with DSMlink, I wouldn't need the SAFC correct?
Am I able to log with an SAFC or just monitor what happens during a WOT pull?
. Excuse me for a stupid question here, MAP sensor.... Not familiar with that one.Ok cool so I had the right understanding then I just wanted to make sure I wasn't confused. Excuse me for a stupid question here, MAP sensor.... Not familiar with that one.
Also, is there a software I would have to buy or does that all come with the DSMlink, or ECMlink now I guess, package?
Thanks.
Edit: let me clarify, I meant to make use of a laptop for logging, as far as the question about additional software possibly being needed.
MAP = Manifold Absolute Pressure
ECMlink and most other tuning solutions include both the hardware (a chip replacement in the ECU) as well as downloadable software that can be installed on a laptop or any other computer. In fact, you can download and install the ECMLink V3 software and view logs from other ECMLink users for free, on virtually any Wondows based PC.
hi im a newb and tried to understand what everyone is talking about..? so i have safc, wideband, and a logger and what a/f ratio do i shoot for at wot?


Not to be rude, but shoot for 11.0 on pump gas... and you have lots of searching and reading to do.
