Enraged78
20+ Year Contributor
- 728
- 13
- Jul 17, 2002
-
South Windsor,
Connecticut
1fast97gsx said:8.5:1 pistons and MLS gasket was used. I thought it seemed low as well. Block was bored .020 and I used ross .020 over pistons. Only thing I think could have been wrong is ring end gaps. What do you think? Would my best bet be to just have it rehoned and pick up a new set of rings and pay extra attention to endgap this time? ( machine shop set gap last time )
I'm actually really curious about this. My machinist and I were going over the endgap of the exact same setup that you have in your car. Ross/Eagle combo with Ross Racing Rings. Ross recommends adding .005 of ring gap for every 30HP per piston increase over stock. Therefore, if you were shooting for 500HP, that would be about 125HP per cylinder, and 75HP per cylinder over stock. Using Ross' calculations, we came up with a gap of .028. We added .003 to err on the side of gap, as what we found later caused us to question the original gap numbers. This brought us to a gap of .031, and it is what we file fit the rings to. Remember that these numbers are when the car is cold, and the gap will close up when the car reaches normal operating temperature. Having too much of a gap is better than too little.
HOWEVER, upon inspecting the original end gaps of the rings (factory pistons), we found that the top ring was touching, which is VERY BAD. When the top ring closes up due to a combination of heat and not enough end gap, you have two major problems. The first is heat from friction. When the ring expands beyond the endgap, the ring is expanding to an area greater than the diamater of the bore. This makes the ring eat into the piston walls, as well as killing itself, and driving up the heat of engine components. It also prevents gasses from passing between the piston rings, and if both number one and two rings do this, the gasses get trapped between the rings, and they cavitate, or "Flutter". This is more likely to happen to both rings because the intense heat coming from the first ring that has expanded beyond it's gap will naturally travel to the second ring. This will do exactly what you are describing.
It will kill the cross-hatch marks prematurely, and eat oil like nobody's business. Double check the end-gap on all your rings. Use the formula Ross gives you with your pistons. If you were running anything over 400 AWHP, you will NEED to be over a .028 endgap, and even that is close.
You can easily see whether or not your rings were closing the gap by looking at the rings. Take the ring out of the piston, and look at the ends where you would file the gap. If they are SHINY, you are touching. If they have some small amounts of carbon deposits, you're generally OK. This is because when you have an endgap, a small amount of gas is escaping past the gap in the rings. When this happens, small deposits get left on the ring ends. Also, check the outer edge of the ring. If it is shiny, and has small scratches in it, it has come into hard contact with the block wall when the ring ends were touching. If it is dull, you're generally OK.
Good luck.
P.S. - Anyone who doubts the use of a torque plate should try a little experiment. Hone your block without a plate, and check it with the bore gauge when it's cool. Now, bolt a torque plate on and check the numbers again. They won't be the same. They will be out or in by as much as .002 inches, and it will vary depending on where in the bore you are. That's enough to cause a problem.
Matt.

