crazyboost
15+ Year Contributor
- 219
- 4
- Sep 23, 2003
Before i get one of these
about over-discussing this popular topic or not searching the forums. ive been reading about this on this site amounst others for several hours now. After several boost leak tests its apparent that my pcv is leaking like many other dsmers on the forums. Ive read tons of debates on emissions vs crankcase ventilation aspects of the pcv valve functions and read the pros/cons of catch cans.... I know that the crankcase has pressure and it must be relieved somehow whether via pcv or the hose going from passenger side of valve cover to the intake/turbo inlet, also the unburned hydrocarbons and acid fumes must be removed from the crankcase valvecover so that they will not corrode parts or turn your oil into a sludge. So i have two basic options, to buy another pcv valve and hope it works for a while (both autoparts stores and dealers pcv's have been known to not work or not work for very long), or to ditch the pcv and go with a catch can. Now with the catch can there isn't a vacuum source to suck all gases out of the valve cover there is just a place for the excess oil and pressure to go. My question is if i left the hose going from the side of the valve cover to the turbo intake, would the turbo-created vacuum be enough to get rid of all my unwanted fumes from my valve cover?
So basically I would block the port going to the pcv on my intake manifold. Gut my pcv and run that to a catch can with a vent/filter on it. Then just leave my existing line going to turo inlet, but maybe throw a fuel filter on their to catch some oil that would be going into my intercooler.
All you pcv gurus out there, is there anything wrong with this setup? sorry if that was confusing and repetitive. thanks
about over-discussing this popular topic or not searching the forums. ive been reading about this on this site amounst others for several hours now. After several boost leak tests its apparent that my pcv is leaking like many other dsmers on the forums. Ive read tons of debates on emissions vs crankcase ventilation aspects of the pcv valve functions and read the pros/cons of catch cans.... I know that the crankcase has pressure and it must be relieved somehow whether via pcv or the hose going from passenger side of valve cover to the intake/turbo inlet, also the unburned hydrocarbons and acid fumes must be removed from the crankcase valvecover so that they will not corrode parts or turn your oil into a sludge. So i have two basic options, to buy another pcv valve and hope it works for a while (both autoparts stores and dealers pcv's have been known to not work or not work for very long), or to ditch the pcv and go with a catch can. Now with the catch can there isn't a vacuum source to suck all gases out of the valve cover there is just a place for the excess oil and pressure to go. My question is if i left the hose going from the side of the valve cover to the turbo intake, would the turbo-created vacuum be enough to get rid of all my unwanted fumes from my valve cover?So basically I would block the port going to the pcv on my intake manifold. Gut my pcv and run that to a catch can with a vent/filter on it. Then just leave my existing line going to turo inlet, but maybe throw a fuel filter on their to catch some oil that would be going into my intercooler.
All you pcv gurus out there, is there anything wrong with this setup? sorry if that was confusing and repetitive. thanks
