- Thread starter
- #151
SixBolt_16G
15+ Year Contributor
- 854
- 770
- Nov 7, 2005
-
Illinois
Found it..This seems like a vacuum leak
This hose coming off the j-pipe. Looks like its 20 years old after only 4 months.

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Found it..This seems like a vacuum leak
Wow… that totally confirms what the data was trying to tell us! Thank you. This will change your fuel trims a lot, Lets see what happens next.Found it..
View attachment 766965
View attachment 766966
This hose coming off the j-pipe. Looks like its 20 years old after only 4 months.Replaced it with another..Ill give it another go after i fix this caliper.
What needs to happen now that the leak has been taken care of? Do i adjust my dead time back to getring +-0 idle fuel trims and run amother cruise/WOT log? Im gonna try to get out and test this car tomorrow if the weather cooperates.Wow… that totally confirms what the data was trying to tell us! Thank you. This will change your fuel trims a lot, Lets see what happens next.
yes! do exactly thatWhat needs to happen now that the leak has been taken care of? Do i adjust my dead time back to getring +-0 idle fuel trims and run amother cruise/WOT log? Im gonna try to get out and test this car tomorrow if the weather cooperates.
I was able to get one run in between storms today. Seems like the SD adjustment brought those values down some, now that the leak is gone, altho it does still seems to spike somewhat. What I find odd tho, is that what I had set for boost control was previously hitting 23psi, but that same setting is now only hitting 15psi?yes! do exactly that
Probably because the air going to the waste gate is no longer leaking out of the hoses - so it is pushing the WG open sooner than before. The values in the WGDuty Cycle table will produce different results now.I was able to get one run in between storms today. Seems like the SD adjustment brought those values down some, now that the leak is gone, altho it does still seems to spike somewhat. What I find odd tho, is that what I had set for boost control was previously hitting 23psi, but that same setting is now only hitting 15psi?
Trying to get the boost to move now. Taking a while because its not as sensitive as it was when i had the leak.. Loaded the new values into the SD table.Probably because the air going to the waste gate is no longer leaking out of the hoses - so it is pushing the WG open sooner than before. The values in the WGDuty Cycle table will produce different results now.
Here is a suggested VE table - with only minor changes to the low boost and fuel trim areas.
Getting closer - this is a low boost and off boost SD recommendation. When you increase the boost, it will go back on top of the SD Peak. Its good to lean out a few cells here right on the leading edge of the peak dome.Trying to get the boost to move now. Taking a while because its not as sensitive as it was when i had the leak.. Loaded the new values into the SD table.
Took a cruise this morning with the same boost settings as the previous log which topped out at 16psi, but this time I hit 19psi with no adjustments for the first WOT @ 195 secs. The second WOT @ 1586 secs, i did adjust the boost a little and hit 21psi.Getting closer - this is a low boost and off boost SD recommendation. When you increase the boost, it will go back on top of the SD Peak. Its good to lean out a few cells here righ on the leading edge of the peak dome.
I took a look at both pulls - here is a suggested SD tweak. Looks like you can Lean out global fuel a touch.Took a cruise this morning with the same boost settings as the previous log which topped out at 16psi, but this time I hit 19psi with no adjustments for the first WOT @ 195 secs. The second WOT @ 1586 secs, i did adjust the boost a little and hit 21psi.
I took a look at both pulls - here is a suggested SD tweak. Looks like you can Lean out global fuel a touch.
View attachment 768135
View attachment 768136
Boom - Global fuel perfect. Leave it right there. Tweak away on the ve cells you touched in the pull to tighen up the calibration. You decide when it is close enough. I'd look at the sharp transitions in the VE curve and see if there is good alignement or not - Likely it could be improved. My experience has shown me, lumps are not normal. If you can improve calibration by removing lumps - prioritise that until you achieve smooth and aligned.Loaded new SD table and set global fuel to 51.2.
We havent talked about adjustments to timing, so im not exactly sure how to do so. Are changes to be made to the TimingMinOct or Max?Crazy how flat the timing looks from 6k -7k. Is that an automatic thing or could you increase timing in the 6.5k-7.5k cells? No knock so far.
Min Oct tables only get used when the knock count is continuously pulling timing. At some point there is a blending between the tables.We havent talked about adjustments to timing, so im not exactly sure how to do so. Are changes to be made to the TimingMinOct or Max?
24psi WOTs @300 secs and @496.. I did the 100 over/under average and made adjustments to the SD table, but it doesnt seem to make a difference in smoothing out that line.Boom - Global fuel perfect. Leave it right there. Tweak away on the ve cells you touched in the pull to tighen up the calibration. You decide when it is close enough. I'd look at the sharp transitions in the VE curve and see if there is good alignement or not - Likely it could be improved. My experience has shown me, lumps are not normal. If you can improve calibration by removing lumps - prioritise that until you achieve smooth and aligned.
View attachment 768347
Crazy how flat the timing looks from 6k -7k. Is that an automatic thing or could you increase timing in the 6.5k-7.5k cells? No knock so far.
Min Oct tables only get used when the knock count is continuously pulling timing. At some point there is a blending between the tables.
This is never going to be a normal case so the min oct tables for all practical purposes are not used - leave stock
Max oct is the table used 99.9% of the time.
To adjust timing, log a parameter called HP by Air. You want to try for 10’s Usually you need to increase timing to achieve 10’s but there might be a case where you are hitting 11’s or 12’s. if its between 3-7k, 11’s or 12’s could be too much. 10 is typical
1-2 deg per attempt. analyze between pulls. don't get greedy24psi WOTs @300 secs and @496.. I did the 100 over/under average and made adjustments to the SD table, but it doesnt seem to make a difference in smoothing out that line.
I logged the hpbyair this time and looks like its under 10 for the whole run. Havent made any updates there as of yet.What kind of increments would i want to move the numbers in the timing table? or is it like trial and error like the ecm boost setting?
I made this animation to show you how I locate the cells in the VE table based on the 3rd gear pull. I open speed density, enable tracking and detach the table so that I can scroll through the pull while watching the VE table.
You can directly edit at any point while you are reviewing a log. The edits will appear as bold text until they are saved to the chip. Averaging helps when there is "noise" or lots of variation in the WB data. For timing, it is especially important not to have a big shift in numbers as the engine accelerates. You will introduce knock with a bad transition. If you get an increase in knock count when you attempt to increase timing - go back to where it was. 10's with HPbyAir is the target, but Knock is the threshold indicator for tuning timing on pump gas. You have an average of 8's with HPbyAir now. - try for 9's.Thank you very much for this.
Is there ever a time that you directly edit a cell when you track the log like this or do you always take an average?
Does editing the timing work the same way by taking an average?
Do you have an example of one of your good logs that you can post, so i can get an idea of what i should shoot for in terms of smoothing out the hpbyair and wbFactor lines?You can directly edit at any point while you are reviewing a log. The edits will appear as bold text until they are saved to the chip. Averaging helps when there is "noise" or lots of variation in the WB data. For timing, it is especially important not to have a big shift in numbers as the engine accelerates. You will introduce knock with a bad transition. If you get an increase in knock count when you attempt to increase timing - go back to where it was. 10's with HPbyAir is the target, but Knock is the threshold indicator for tuning timing on pump gas. You have an average of 8's with HPbyAir now. - try for 9's.