DSMunknown
15+ Year Contributor
- 4,108
- 42
- Sep 16, 2004
-
Worcester,
Massachusetts
Something about clipping turbos just makes me sick. I would never.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Yes the new DSM 18g turbo is both water and oil cooled. If you have any other questions, please let us know.
Thank you,
Amber
Sales Team
Forced Performance
972-984-1800
www.forcedperformance.net
Something about clipping turbos just makes me sick. I would never.
just recieved it today and man, it almost looks smaller than my 16g from external dimensions which i think is great. should be a great sleeper turbo.
just recieved it today and man, it almost looks smaller than my 16g from external dimensions which i think is great. should be a great sleeper turbo.
Can you post up photos? Any updates?
I agree, Im thinking about getting this turbo....would like to know how its performing.

http://www.amsperformance.com/store/product_info.php?cPath=41_89&products_id=1668
This may shed some light. They claim the only difference between the two runs was the turbo and the MAF.
I dont know, the evo3 has proven so much I would have to see more runs and dyno sheets about this 18g for me to consider on purchasing it
That was also a small 16 vs the 18g
Did anyone every answer/ or mention anything about using the TDO6SL2's 14psi wastegate/ w.g. actuator on a regular evo3 16g in hope to holding boost longer to redline than what the 16g has been known to hold?
And id like to see some more dyno sheets and user impressions of this turbo in comparison to an evo3... I believe for most of us whom are still in evo3 and smaller range; the max pump gas amount of power this thing can gain over a evo3 is what will make this turbo appealing and sell more vs the max power output. Reason i say this is considering ppl whod buy a turbo in this cfm range are probably only looking for a fun pump gas street set up vs a race gas set up... Most ppl who are playing with race gas skip straight to the 750 cfm + sized turbos...
You have no evo3 16g compressor map to which to compare it. There IS, however, dynoproof that the 18g compressor flows at least 55hp more than an evo3 16g. 55hp is a half second in the quarter mile and at least 5 carlinks. . .On this side of the Mississippi, that's a spanking!I would also, I dont think its worth the upgrade from a 16g to this turbo. Its a little more than a 16g so it may be worth it over the evo if its your first upgrade.
NOT AT ALL!!!!!! The evo is wore out (at choke) at 400whp. The 18g compressor has broken the 450whp mark. There is no evo3 compressor that has done that.The evo 16g can hit 400whp easy on race or e85 and has been proven to break 450whp.
dsm-onster said:NOT AT ALL!!!!!! The evo is wore out (at choke) at 400whp. The 18g compressor has broken the 450whp mark. There is no evo3 compressor that has done that.


ahh..the old new EVO III 16 compressor 
Do you mean FP machines evo3 compressor housings to accept the 18g wheel?The EVO III is proven for years and years. The sticker price for the 18G looks great, but I would mug my neighbor and upgrade to a FP3052 BB Series if I would to upgrade.
Now if you're upgrading for a 14b or t25 go ahead with the 'new' 18G.
PS: On the FP site did you guys notice the "01470" stamp on on the 'new' 18G compressor housing?ahh..the old new EVO III 16 compressor