The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

anyone else have lower honeycomb problems? [Merged 10-6]

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

wishIhadaturbo

20+ Year Contributor
117
0
Jul 14, 2002
Dayton, Ohio
I can't be the first person that has done this. I busted out both honeycombs in my MAF. Does anybody sell replacements ? Or have an idea about what I should do. The car is idleing very rough now and misses whenever I am not accelerating.

Will
 
On a 1G, the lower one can be done. The upper... get a new MAS, dude. It's going to run like utter crap. Probably will run better with the MAS entirely unplugged.
 
So i'm doing some work to my car and decided to free air restriction in and out. In a month my project will be over, anyway i removed the large center honeycomb from my MAS. According to RRE it stated that its a don't do, even though that answers my question i threw away the honeycomb, so is anyone running without it and if not what will happen if i do.

Guys listen to him he might be so smart that he can make his own fireing order (Quote from Smokey Yunick)

When some one like RRE says don't touch it and then you go ahead and do it and then throw away the parts, Well good luck with your project.
 
Just curious if anyone else has removed the honeycomb from the MAFt?

Do you think it is more restrictive then it is efficient for directing the airflow?

Also, if anyone has removed it, did you get any weird noises afterwards?

I had taken it out of our spare maft and now it makes a ghost-like WHOOOOOOOO sound right before it starts spooling up??
 
I have mine removed because I have seen them come loose and pieces go into the engine. I don't have any airflow metering problems.
 
I read your profile and it says that you are running a 2g Maft in your car? From what I remember reading on 1000Q, on a 2G, you are not supposed to remove any of the gold honeycomb: 1000 AAQ - Terms

Now has this information changed? Dunno.

d
 
Weird, I wonder if it's the air rushing through making the noise or something else?? But that is all I had changed since the day before.. well and welded up the cracked o2 housing, but it had never made the noise prior?

But it straight up sounds like a Halloween soundtrack with the wooooo noise.
 
Thank you for the clarification. I still hold by my link in my post that also includes information on a 1G although is not pertinanent to her application with a GM Maft setup.. So 1992awdlaser, you said you removed the entire honeycomb without any problems? Is your idle still fine? Are you running the stock 1G throttle body? Did you have have to compensate at all in DSMLink for anything? I'm curious for the sake of knowledge.

d
 
So 1992awdlaser, you said you removed the entire honeycomb without any problems?
Correct. I also have a couple friends that have done the same and they just have chipped ecu's

bane3d said:
Is your idle still fine?
With all the parts on my car it idles better than when it was stock. Nothing changed. All I did with the idle was up it to 1,000. The only reason I did that was because I don't want the locals to know I have cams. It will idle fine at 750, just lopes a little from the cams.

bane3d said:
Are you running the stock 1G throttle body?
Yes. Only thing done to it is the fiav is blocked off.

bane3d said:
Did you have have to compensate at all in DSMLink for anything?
Not at all.
 
Thank you for the clarification. I still hold by my link in my post that also includes information on a 1G although is not pertinanent to her application with a GM Maft setup.. So 1992awdlaser, you said you removed the entire honeycomb without any problems? Is your idle still fine? Are you running the stock 1G throttle body? Did you have have to compensate at all in DSMLink for anything? I'm curious for the sake of knowledge.

d

I know you had asked 1992awdlaser, but I had removed mine, and it idles fine, stock TB with fiav/ isc blocked off, and didn't do any compensation with ostrich. The only thing different is the loud wooooo noise?
 
Don't know if any of you care, but I will be removing the metal bar that is in the maf pretty soon. I am going to compare logs to see if I gain anything.

You can see what I'm talking about in this picture:
You must be logged in to view this image or video.


What it will look like removed:
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
I read on another forum there is a purpose for the honeycomb. Oddily enough it increase the airflow or it will help the sensor.

It's supposed to straighten the airflow not increase it. LSx guys take the screen out also without any ill effects.
 
It's supposed to straighten the airflow not increase it. LSx guys take the screen out also without any ill effects.

Yep, that right. It will straighten the airflow productively towards the sensors.

There is a possibility the sensors will read inconsitently causing you to go lean. Unless you have DSM Link to correct this stop messing with the airflow.

Honeycombs Forums
 
Yep, that right. It will straighten the airflow productively towards the sensors.

There is a possibility the sensors will read inconsitently causing you to go lean. Unless you have DSM Link to correct this stop messing with the airflow.

Honeycombs Forums

I have Ostrich which has all the functions that link has. And I finally got the AFRs to 10.5 so I'm not worried about going lean.. LOL
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top