Vegas Smith
20+ Year Contributor
- 5,193
- 3,153
- Dec 2, 2002
-
Houston,
Texas
Alright everyone, no need to fight. Is it safe to say the g-series is the latest and greatest? I thought their gtx gen-2 was?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Keep reading... https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/e...down-gtx3076r-vs-gtx3576r-2.html#post10034318Read the first sentence. He stated he compensated with psig (boost pressure).
That is exactly what I was saying man. To a t. Lol.
What’s the disconnect?
I don't think you understand that these two engine aren't similar/comparable. Not only evo heads flow differently then ours, more efficient, the car also has a mivec head and a TS setup, which further effects/skewa the results. Nothing is comparable at all.Click the link and get educated so you don't look like this big of an asshole again. Same car, same turbine housing, etc, etc, etc...
https://www.evolutionm.net/forums/e...602163-gtx-showdown-gtx3076r-vs-gtx3576r.html
Wtf are you talking about? The only thing that changes is the turbo. I’m not trying to compare the power figures or powerband to a dsm engine, I’m comparing how the turbos perform. This could have been done on any engine and the results would be the same. Spools the same, makes more power.I don't think you understand that these two engine aren't similar/comparable. Not only evo heads flow differently then ours, more efficient, the car also has a mivec head and a TS setup, which further effects/skewa the results. Nothing is comparable at all.
Who cares? What it to you? The turbo is already bought and the 3076 has and amazing track record and proven to make 600whp wrung out which is more that the op wants.Wtf are you talking about? The only thing that changes is the turbo. I’m not trying to compare the power figures or powerband to a dsm engine, I’m comparing how the turbos perform. This could have been done on any engine and the results would be the same. Spools the same, makes more power.
Wrong. The thread is on the right track comparing two different turbos.. Just not ideal / perfect. Too many variables and changes by the host on the test car for a direct conclusion.I don't think you understand that these two engine aren't similar/comparable. Not only evo heads flow differently then ours, more efficient, the car also has a mivec head and a TS setup, which further effects/skewa the results. Nothing is comparable at all.
". At least on evoM people are actually doing shit over there and posting it. Go on their dyno results forums and you'll literally find hundreds of results with most of it done professionally. Dyno sheets, full setup with all questions answered. I challenge anyone to find me 3 threads in the last 12 months on this site.