thegchild04
15+ Year Contributor
- 410
- 0
- Dec 24, 2003
-
Albany,
New York
i wonder what temps you would of got if you didnt cut the vents in
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Yeah that would have been more useful information to most people I think... those vents on the silver 2g do actually look good.
Very nice. Are the sides of the slits molded, it looks like they have depth? How much difference in cooling capacity did you notice? Anywhere near as much as Rice?
I like those much better, -sorry Kevin.
i wonder what temps you would of got if you didnt cut the vents in
??Those are just 95-96 Talon skirts.
??
Do you mean he used pieces of the sideskirts to give the slits in the bumper a 3D effect?
I don't think I understand your post.
True, but why? He doesn't need the system to be any more efficient than it already is.
Btw, the fan controller has other nice options. You can wire the a/c clutch control to the unit so whenever it see the a/c turn on your a/c fan turns on regardless of temps. There's also a fan delay system kind of like a turbo timer where you can have the fans turn off from 0 to 2 minutes after the car shuts off.True, but why? He doesn't need the system to be any more efficient than it already is.
First of all, NASCAR stock cars don't have fmics, they are all motor and n/a. You're comparing apples and oranges.
Second, as the beginning of this thread shows, there was a clear and large difference between opening up a clear path to the radiator, bypassing the fmic. This is proven by logs. There is simply no argument that direct airflow to the radiator does not improve cooling efficiency. It does. That's why all late model performance cars have large radiator vents in the front bumper by design. The best way for the best cooling? Run no bumper at all like some people do at the track.
Third, air flow isn't just about resistance but many other factors like turbulance and curve/angles. Btw, implying no air flows through a fmic because of resistance is just plain silly. Since you're interested about how stock cars do it, read this article which is where I sourced my info before designing my whole cooling system. It will teach you the specifics about airflow and radiator cooling efficiency:
http://www.stockcarracing.com/techarticles/general/scrp_0509_efficient_cooling_radiator/
Lastly, again some of you are totally missing the point, which isn't just radiator vents. It's a single piece of a comprehensive cooling system. I challenge you to build or show me a more efficient system that can cool at any range chosen between 150-210 degrees on a dsm.
That information is at the beginning of the thread. Just take away the before/after results of cutting the radiator vents. But everyone's results will be different depending on what their whole cooling system consists of. There are a lot of variables at work. There's also a synergistic effect between most of the mods.
