98eclipseRS
20+ Year Contributor
- 2,850
- 38
- Jan 1, 2003
-
NORCAL,
California
93AWDTalon1 said:No if it was 2.0L than it wouldn't have as much lower end as it does and would rev higher.
I think the powerband and it's lack of tq comes from it's smim.
that and spool isn't the greatest with a .82 a/r on the hotside.
I have seen a dyno of an EVO III 16G Galant VR4 (2.0L) put out more torque than that.