Slippi84
20+ Year Contributor
- 4,454
- 20
- Jun 8, 2005
-
Cinnaminson,
New Jersey
I definitely believe that it limited pressure up top. So much so that it was a detriment to power. I think that was the problem. My guess is that the lifters themselves couldn't maintain and were collapsing.
I'll give you a chance to look at my dyno sheets to see if you want to hold to that statement.
Let's start off by prefacing this with my car's specifics;
2.0 NA, 12.5 comp, Crower 3's, Crower springs, SS valves, P+P head, 8200 redline, 2.4 valve train, MSnS, I guess that's the pertinent stuff.
Wether or not the SRT reacts differently, I can't say.
The car ran basically the same line up to peak powerish (actually a couple of slight gain spots).
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
(I don't know why we didn't use the 204.9 run,)
But right before peak we had the waterfall happen. Here's a more focused shot:
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
You can see how it just starts falling off. We did three runs (the red, extended one is obviously without the mod). First run had the cooling off time of me putting in the mod while the car was on the dyno (maybe 15 minutes tops from shut off to start up). That was the "best" one (the pink? one). Then we did two more pretty much back to back (that held pretty much the same line).
To me that is definitive proof that this mod does not do what it says it does. No bashing, no hatred, no anger, no axe to grind, just the facts as I see them.
MB
Oh yeah, for fun here's the 204.9whp run;
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
And a big thanks to Matt and my buddies at DentSport for letting me play.
STill kinda confused it what the second graph is? Is that oil pressure? The pics are too small. From the looks of things you made 1whp which could be fluke but like I said before I didn't think it was a hp mod more of a better running situation mod.
)

