silverbulletAWD
15+ Year Contributor
- 126
- 0
- Aug 3, 2003
-
Holland,
Michigan
Interesting concept I thought. Not brand new, but interesting none the less.
http://www.ducati.com/bikes/techcafe.jhtml?detail=article&value=theory&part=general&artID=11
http://www.ducati.com/bikes/techcafe.jhtml?detail=article&value=theory&part=general&artID=11
) where effeciency is key. However this causes another problem, a motorcycle typically will rev to 12-16k RPM to make the most of its low tq, low displacment motor; unless that piston is going to be REALLY heavy (I can't remember the exact weight I calculated, but something close to 1.5kg) at 14k RPM you're going to essentially "float" the piston l(ike you do a valve) between the forced exhaust and intake strokes. This added weight would more than offset any gains you would see via a LOT of piston Inertia. So yeah, while its a pretty cool idea, its just not that practical as it sits. Much more practical advances can be found with cam-less, and/or valve-less valve train setups IMO.
. But like I said, just thought it was interesting and maybe some of these guys might think the same. It's good to excercise the brain with "outside-of-the-box" thinking every once and a while
.
