oldman
DSM Wiseman
- 9,789
- 196
- Jun 21, 2003
-
Dayton,
New Jersey
Stay on topic people. 
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

97gstnick said:. well guys, i tuned my car a bit and was running about 19lbs,(spiking to 22). and it felt pretty good. i just dont know if it should be faster? maybe its as fast as it should be? i guess maybe i had more of an expectation? hmm.
one of the things that got me doubting the power it was makin was the fact that my stock clutch is still holding up strong. i have heard people say keep it at low boost because it will slip. but i was just lookin in the forums and some guy on here is makin 468whp! on stock clutch. so maybe it can hold more than believed..?
i know my car needs to be tuned better, but i completely refuse to have someone else do it. i am doing it ALL by myself. if its slow, then its slow. i dont care, i just like to do my own artwork. but i dont mind advice. im gonna keep messing with it and try to work little things out. i know i gotta do some basic maintenance on it too.
. you dont know . you have to know. 50trim wont be that efficient enough if you have stock head , TB, intake manifold (more or less) and very important cams. you need to get that AIR into your engine. a lof people here told you to get a logger, maybe its time for dsmlink (can dattalog anything) to make everything much easier for you. one more time very important , get that AIR into your engine.mirkoelek said:ok, some people mentioned tuning, maft-t , saft, so everything about fuel. hmm. lets say fuel is not as close as important as AIR. you think with 1000cc injectors and perfect tune and 14b you can make 400hp ---- i dont think so. think about it , air is important. you have pretty big turbo (a lot of air) there is no doubt about that. but does that air coming into your engine.. you dont know . you have to know. 50trim wont be that efficient if you have stock head , TB, intake manifold (more or less) and very important cams. you need to get that AIR into your engine. a lof people here told you to get a logger, maybe its time for dsmlink to make everything much easier for you. one more time very important , AIR is not going into your engine>.
97gstnick said:im gonna log my car when i get a chance and post up how much air it is flowing at certain rpm points. maybe that will help you help me.
Good idea, log tps, rpm, timing and o2.97gstnick said:im gonna log my car when i get a chance and post up how much air it is flowing at certain rpm points. maybe that will help you help me.
ok, maybe i just misjudged your tone. im sorry, but a lot of people on here just like to talk trash and offer nothing. forget what i said also. thanks for the good luck gesture.mirkoelek said:i'm not insulting your inteligence, at least didnt want to. Just never mind what i said. good luck with resolving the problem.
I know what you mean. Not necesserily you have to agre with everybody here. Just listen what makes sense to you. You are the one who know your car the best. I have a friend, he would never take my advice, but everybody else's. he rebult his engine 3 times. we have the same car. At the time i bougth mine stock and had no knowledge about anything (didnt know where turbo is located). He had some modifications and he was so proud with all that. Like you said he would insult my inteligence. I learned a lot here ( damn some of these guys are great), just reading posts and asking questions. My friend wouldnt do that, just being stubborn. My car for the last two years never had even little oil leak ( let me knock on the wood). Once again i'm not relating anything of this to you, just talking BS here97gstnick said:ok, maybe i just misjudged your tone. im sorry, but a lot of people on here just like to talk trash and offer nothing. forget what i said also. thanks for the good luck gesture.
. i love to be neck to neck with the viper, with evo16g only!!!!.mirkoelek said:I know what you mean. Not necesserily you have to agre with everybody here. Just listen what makes sense to you. You are the one who know your car the best. I have a friend, he would never take my advice, but everybody else's. he rebult his engine 3 times. we have the same car. At the time i bougth mine stock and had no knowledge about anything (didnt know where turbo is located). He had some modifications and he was so proud with all that. Like you said he would insult my inteligence. I learned a lot here ( damn some of these guys are great), just reading posts and asking questions. My friend wouldnt do that, just being stubborn. My car for the last two years never had even little oil leak ( let me knock on the wood). Once again i'm not relating anything of this to you, just talking BS here. i love to be neck to neck with the viper, with evo16g only!!!!.
kanderson111 said:97 gstnick did you get a chance to do any logs yet?
Don't get discouraged by these guys and they're turbo battle. They can't get through they're heads that the 16g and 50trim are both good turbos. 16g pulls harder in first gear and part of second, 50 trim more than makes up for it in the upper rpm range of 2,3,&4 gear. But all of that doesn't matter, we need to get you up to speed. Some of us are more worried about helping you than comparing turbos.
InjenTalon96 said:ok so i had to clairify what years i was talking about. ive seen 50 trims on a 1g go alot faster then one on a 2g. if you were able to get some port work and bigger tb and intake mani ide bet ude see huge gains.
blcknspo0ln said:no.. I believe that he is just an info regurgitator (sp?).. meaning he reads one or two things about a certain thing, and repeats it in a tech arguement to feel smart. no harm really. that's what us other members are for.
besides, it's painfully obvious that if you get a bigger TB/mani and portwork you WILL see bigger gains... no sh*t captain obvious..
but yes please, let's get onto some logs and wideband readings..
also, (while I admit I've fell for this too), that the mentality of most DSMers is that if it's not going fast with the mods you have.. just buy more things and slap them on. where if 90% of the tuners on here would work on their TUNING and MAINTENANCe.. they would go a lot faster with the same amount of mods..
one more edit*.. while i'm not too keen on tuning with a GM MAFT.. I believe they go by increments of 2%.. you may want to read up on HOW to tune the GM MAFT and then use them once you get your logs running. also, it is apparent that the MAFT (while being a hit or miss) can be erradic when producing constant results as far as tuneability and reliability. perhaps you should consider an SAFC to further fine tune..
besides, does a MAFT work like the AFC, where it has a HI and a LO setting?
97gstnick said:yea, i guess my upstream o2 sensore is shot. its giving a super lean reading. and plus i have bout 120,000 miles on the motor and used to run a walbro 255 wit no afpr for bout six months. so i am pretty dang certain that it is the o2. its makin it tough to tune it properly. im thinkin about buying the aem dual channel wideband kit from slowboy. from my understanding, you just screw in the o2 into your stock location and it has a harness that goes to your stock o2 harness and give the ecu a narrowband reading...?
you can do it, but to much hustle.97gstnick said:yea, i guess my upstream o2 sensore is shot. its giving a super lean reading. and plus i have bout 120,000 miles on the motor and used to run a walbro 255 wit no afpr for bout six months. so i am pretty dang certain that it is the o2. its makin it tough to tune it properly. im thinkin about buying the aem dual channel wideband kit from slowboy. from my understanding, you just screw in the o2 into your stock location and it has a harness that goes to your stock o2 harness and give the ecu a narrowband reading...?
mirkoelek said:you can do it, but to much hustle.
AL92 said:I had an RS49 on my last 1g.I had 650 fics,afpr,supra pump,maft and custom chip.Apexi n1 downpipe and catback.
My car was very slow mph and quartermile.Almost every run.
Occasional run was better.I don't have the times recorded but they were like 13s most of the time.and not even low 13s.
My stock clutch was definitely not up to the job .You can see that in the 60fts they were horrible...horrible and got more horrible the higher boost and rpm I tried.There is no way a stock 1 or 2 g clutch can not slip on the 50 trim at 20psi.You are dreaming if you think its not slipping.It is costing you mph and 60fts and losing power like crazy.
I also was running stock sidemount and it would heatsoak fast.Another big power loss there.
To top it off had timing wrong from slipped stock balancer.
I also had bad phantom knock killing huge power and only finally got rid of that with programming in the custom chip.After that the 50 was much better but the stock clutch and intercooler still killed the potential of it.I bought a new clutch and huge fmic but then sold the car and got my present 2g.I sold my 50 trim and planning on FP3065.
97gstnick said:ok, i think i might have found out a slight problem with the motor. it appears that the intake cam or exhaust cam slipped a tooth. its either the exhaust andvanced or the intake retarded a tooth. i am thinkin this would make a a little difference in the cars performance. how do i take tension of the tensioner so i can fix the cams?