mavisky
DSM Wiseman
- 5,390
- 62
- Sep 13, 2002
-
Atlanta,
Georgia
On the contrary. Timing is pulled immediately once knock is detected.
I thought that was the case for the 2g ecu, but not the 1g ecu. Perhaps I've been wrong.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
On the contrary. Timing is pulled immediately once knock is detected.
No just a fast 4g63.... I wish I could see more people stretch the stock shortblocks for as long as some people can. But they just blow them up because of their horrible tuning abilities. I bought that motor @ 60K and when I sold it last month I had 110K on it. Still runs like a champ in another locals car...
I never had a problem with phantom knock, I get 0 knock when I have my tune perfect.. If I did not run out of fuel pump(walboro 255 not the high pressure version)and injector. The car would have done 132+mph. But thats in the past. I have a 2.4L + t67 now. I'm just saying Not everybodys problems are a knock sensor. I mean This is tuners for crying out loud not NABR. I can guarantee your pretty much in a .001% catagory that runs Haltek here.. And you may get like 5-10 guys here than run AEM and thats it too... So the mitsu knock sensor will save 90% of this boards motors if you follow me...
I was under that impression for a 1g too. I know for a 2g that the knock detector is ignored under 2500rpms or so. I've logged with dsmlink and saw no knock retard. Then went to my scanmaster and saw 1-2 counts. randomly. Then went back to dsmlink and still saw nothing for several pulls. Not that this is a guarantee that the sensor was just not detecting knock when running the link logger. But, I was confused until I researched and found guys were saying this. . .
TMO Datalogger 101 . . . Scroll down 2/3s of the way.
I was under that impression for a 1g too. I know for a 2g that the knock detector is ignored under 2500rpms or so. I've logged with dsmlink and saw no knock retard. Then went to my scanmaster and saw 1-2 counts. randomly. Then went back to dsmlink and still saw nothing for several pulls. Not that this is a guarantee that the sensor was just not detecting knock when running the link logger. But, I was confused until I researched and found guys were saying this. . .
TMO Datalogger 101 . . . Scroll down 2/3s of the way.

Mainly because you only get one chance to tune the first start, after it's fired up once and there's some heat transfer you have to wait till it cools all the way down and come back to it, i guess i haven't had the time or drive to be out there in the cold that often, i usually start it and come back inside for 20-30 minutes when it's that cold. Today we hit 30* woohoooo I'm going motorcycle riding here in a bit... Now can you see how cold it normally is here, when I'm nuts enough to ride a motorcycle at 30* because it's a warm spell for us 
Thanks for finding that info Matt.


I use dsmlink and tuned for 0 knock on all my runs. This was on my old stock 6 bolt bottom and .63 a/r 35R setup.. Full weight 2g doing 128-129mph @ 28-29 psi and 23 degrees advance with 13.5 AFRs 0 knock 400+ track passes hundreds of steet races and daily driven since it was put together a couple years ago. I've even had the wastegate line come undone 2-3 times logging boost to 42psi and 12-15 counts of knock on one gear pulls. I just sold this motor right before christmas with this exact setup to a local guy and its already up and running fast.
I really don't see the problem in tuning for 0 knock?
No just a fast 4g63.... I wish I could see more people stretch the stock shortblocks for as long as some people can. But they just blow them up because of their horrible tuning abilities. I bought that motor @ 60K and when I sold it last month I had 110K on it. Still runs like a champ in another locals car...
I never had a problem with phantom knock, I get 0 knock when I have my tune perfect.. If I did not run out of fuel pump(walboro 255 not the high pressure version)and injector. The car would have done 132+mph. But thats in the past. I have a 2.4L + t67 now. I'm just saying Not everybodys problems are a knock sensor. I mean This is tuners for crying out loud not NABR. I can guarantee your pretty much in a .001% catagory that runs Haltek here.. And you may get like 5-10 guys here than run AEM and thats it too... So the mitsu knock sensor will save 90% of this boards motors if you follow me...
That is actually a long-standing DSM myth. Knock count is knock retard just expressed differently. If you have knock counts, you have knock retard. The whole idea of timing advance only getting pulled over 7 counts etc is rubbish. The author of that article didn't exactly explain that concept very well.
I personally have my knock sensor mounted very loosely on my block. It's nowhere near tight and I am comfortable with it's sensitivity.
Also, on my old setup, my knock sensor was only active from 5,500rpm+ ; Basically, when the engine was under full boost.
Even 4th gear was torque steering so bad i could barely keep it on the road without some decent concentration.
i cannot agree with these people more. i have basically disconnect my knock sensor and tune around engine noise, afrs, plugs and timing. i stick with a basic safe tune with no signs of auditable knock nor signs on my plugs. i have been doing this for over a year now at 23psi, meth, STOCK block, STOCK headstuds, and STOCK headgasket. my car see's 23psi and 8k everyday.
im not telling the everyone on the boards to go out and do this but i have found it takes alot to blow up a well built 4g63.
, my really good buddy Hutch would break loose in 4th with his old gst. leaving me like WTFBlack_Bullet said:I use a knock buzzer that is trigger by the ecu at 10 counts of knock and above.
...
(It) Has proven very reliable for me in the past, and i base most of my tuning off of it when doing tuning pulls just because the stock knock sensor is so inconsistent.
So how does using a buzzer that is based off the readings from the stock knock sensor get around the "inconsistent" stock knock sensor?
If you have a chip, then knock can be desensitised with phantom knock code and knock decay rate adjustments.
After battling with my KS. I grounded it. Why? I know the car ran rich, I run straight meth injection and a big IC. Actually, I was still running the stock smic and 14b when I pulled it.
The other reason I pulled it was I know my car, and was in for some experimentation. If it blew up so be it.
So, with the logger counting timing in the mid twenties, and boost at about 20 PSI (on the 14b) the car ran like a scared cat!
I ran like that as a daily commuter for 12 months with no problems. Had a failure in the meth pump once, and had some very light auduble detonation for a split second before I backed out of it. No harm done.
The latest incarnation is a 20g and big fmic. I did lose the HG once, but that was with run away boost (30 psi +) and there was no damage done (so no knock) Pistons fine, all fine. the HG was a stock composite and it was obvious that it just gave way.
So, Ill continue to pay attention to the car, and enjoy no KS. I have no room for error if I lose the meth, but thats fine with me.
My 2 cents.
edit- I should say though that once I have a way of tailoring a knock curve (standalone) I would utilize that.
AS long as you dont get crazy with timing or lean AFR's and since you seem to know what your motor wants you'll continue to be fine i'm sure. I am confident without knock capabilities. but after getting My J&S i wouldn't give it up for anything...But i wouldn't run a stocker again either!
)