t67

[black91awdturbo]

I have a 2.0l motor it has a very built bottom end manley rods, ross pistons etc, up top 272 cams and mild port work and a jmf intake manifold is all. I am not about to get a turbo for this set up, at what time would you think this turbo would start to spool? I am looking for the big t3 guys here. I want the turbo with the .63ar and the stage 5 wheel, I will be driving this on the street and I dont mind to rev to get the power. I just dont want any MITSU bolt on housing so I dont wanna here the get the 50trim crap . So lets here it guys when do you think this will hit full spool (20-25psi) Again I am talking about a t67

 

[desolateboosted]

Probably 5k

 

[black91awdturbo]

thats what I think late 4k which is doable.

 

[bytheway]

my friend had one on his 2.0 and with stock redline it fell out of boost every shift. but if youre revving it out im sure you will be fine. he said spool was about 5000 in his car.

 

[nanokpsi]

Its about 5500 with a .68 t4 and a p trim. Boost recovery between shifts isn't the greatest (read awful).

 

[Rick@AP]

So no FP3575 for you since you don't want a Mitsu flange compatible housing.

Evil-eagle has a full T67 after switching from a FP3575. You should read his review.

 

[black91awdturbo]

well I did read his reveiw and he said some thing about the turbo blades hitting the housing and he wasnt sure how much that was adding to the problems he was having. Also he had the pte verison which personally I dont thing is as good as the Garrett verison just simply cause every local tha has had pte any has failed.

 

[nanokpsi]

So no FP3575 for you since you don't want a Mitsu flange compatible housing.

Evil-eagle has a full T67 after switching from a FP3575. You should read his review.

His car will be much faster on his new set up. Even then he still runs a much larger hot side than me. AT 550whp you need to get away form the bolt ons.

Personally, I would get something this big with a BB CHRA just for the lag between shifts.

 

[Rick@AP]

His car will be much faster on his new set up. Even then he still runs a much larger hot side than me. AT 550whp you need to get away form the bolt ons.

Personally, I would get something this big with a BB CHRA just for the lag between shifts.

He definitely will make more peak HP but with the larger hotside, IMHO he will loose total power under the curve. Although his shift from a ported stock manifold to a tubular one should definitely help to gain more power under the curve. I would have loved to have seen him switch to a tubular manifold with the FP turbo before going to a T4 T67.

I am using the FP3575 and I have no lag between shifts. A bigger engine eliminates lag quite effectively.

I do agree though that this is the largest setup I would ever consider using as a "bolt up".

 

[GVR4592]

He definitely will make more peak HP but with the larger hotside, IMHO he will loose total power under the curve. Although his shift from a ported stock manifold to a tubular one should definitely help to gain more power under the curve. I would have loved to have seen him switch to a tubular manifold with the FP turbo before going to a T4 T67.

I am using the FP3575 and I have no lag between shifts. A bigger engine eliminates lag quite effectively.

I do agree though that this is the largest setup I would ever consider using as a "bolt up".

At what RPM do you see full boost? Do you have a 2.3, 2.4 or 2.0?

 

[nanokpsi]

He definitely will make more peak HP but with the larger hotside, IMHO he will loose total power under the curve. Although his shift from a ported stock manifold to a tubular one should definitely help to gain more power under the curve. I would have loved to have seen him switch to a tubular manifold with the FP turbo before going to a T4 T67.

I am using the FP3575 and I have no lag between shifts. A bigger engine eliminates lag quite effectively.

I do agree though that this is the largest setup I would ever consider using as a "bolt up".

Any time you have a laggier turbo you are going to have a shorter power band. The t67 has made 720-730whp on Supra's. Its much too large to throw in a bolt on if you really want to use the wheel. I have seen some people make good power on the 3575, but those people would be makeing 700whp with the t4/p trim. Jake will make more on boost alone than he did with the 3575 and the n2o.

 

[Slippi84]

Any time you have a laggier turbo you are going to have a shorter power band. The t67 has made 720-730whp on Supra's. Its much too large to throw in a bolt on if you really want to use the wheel. I have seen some people make good power on the 3575, but those people would be makeing 700whp with the t4/p trim. Jake will make more on boost alone than he did with the 3575 and the n2o.

Maybe you should go back and read where he needed to use nitrous to make even close to the power he was makin with the 3575. He called the t67 the worse trubo he had ever owned. Unless your trying to go 9's the bolt on housing is fine.

 

[nanokpsi]

Maybe you should go back and read where he needed to use nitrous to make even close to the power he was makin with the 3575. He called the t67 the worse trubo he had ever owned. Unless your trying to go 9's the bolt on housing is fine.

Maybe you should go read his update where the car is much faster w/o the notrous after the turbo was rebuilt. Turbos tend to not make good power when the wheels are contacting the housings (as Jake's were). I know the bolt ons have a big fan base, and the fp is the best bolt on turbine housing out there. It is still far inferior to a t4 hot side when you want to use a 67mm wheel's potential. I would go on to say that bolt ons are fine, as long as you don't have 600+whp goals. And if you don't want that much power, you have no business buying a 3575.

 

[Rick@AP]

At what RPM do you see full boost? Do you have a 2.3, 2.4 or 2.0?

Around 4100 or so. (i can't remember exactly since I havent been able to drive the car in months). I have an atypical 2.3.

 

[PSI NRG]

i run a 37r with a .82 a/r and I get 20 psi by 4700 rpms on a 2.0 fully built,272s,magnus w/ 75mm TB

 

[nanokpsi]

i run a 37r with a .82 a/r and I get 20 psi by 4700 rpms on a 2.0 fully built,272s,magnus w/ 75mm TB

Which "37r" do you have?

 

[black91awdturbo]

ya the turbo was broken when it was called the worst turbo he ever had and still went tens and faster than the good mitsu turbo did.

 

[gsxkid81]

i have a t3/t70. the turbo has a .70ar exhaust housing with a divied flange.i had geoff at full race make a manifold for me. my car has 8:1 compression and an extreme ported head w/272,magnus intake =. my car makes 20 psi @5050 rpms. i just dynoed it it made 502whp @20psi.i measured my turbo intake fins my major fin is 90mm and my minor is 69.9mm