DSM_dreams
15+ Year Contributor
- 51
- 0
- Nov 5, 2006
-
Sussex,
i would get both personally 1 to have better durabilty/reliablity , and they staight up look better too
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
i voted both, because when you do something do it right the first time. If you decide to do just one, i would get the hoses, you get looks and function. The canister is just looks.

Mine is in the passenger sidewell where the smic used to be, never had a problem with it. Just extendeed the coolant hose a little bit.
im a true dsmer, I zip tied it in place. Works perfect, and there are holes on the side of the stock overflow thatll make it real tight. Havent had a single problem....oh and for filling it up? Remember, its an OVERFLOW, just slowly fill up your water neck, and the hole on the side will suck up any, so just slowly add more. only takes like 2 minutes to fill up halfway.When I put in my front mount intercooler I just went to the junk yard and picked out an overflow that fit where I wanted it to go. I secured it with some universal mounting bracket that I picked up at Auto Zone. My air filter is where my side mount used to be so it was easy to place the new overflow where the air filter box used to be.