- Thread starter
- #26
pneumo
20+ Year Contributor
- 3,763
- 61
- Oct 19, 2002
-
Bay Area,
California
Yeah, I'm due for some new pics, the car looks hot with the slicks and carbon hatch. I just need a clear day with good light.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Lol I thought you already married to him after his chip/help got you over your 2yr drought.


Congrats, that is awesome.
For some reason I thought that you still had an internal WG with the valvespring under the actuator to limit movement. Does that valvespring still allow the WG to open much?
Great work and thanks for posting it up.



The wastegate doesn't open much. I have a dumptube and I can hear it when the wastegate opens. It's not very loud anymore. It used to be louder with the regular wastegate actuator.
l
The wastegate doesn't open much. I have a dumptube and I can hear it when the wastegate opens. It's not very loud anymore. It used to be louder with the regular wastegate actuator.
Phil, Josh,
I'm flattered that you guys are fighting over me, but you both should know that I can only be good friends with you since my heart is promised to my true love; my Talon!

Did you see any change in the boost curve with the valve spring setup vs the oem actuator?
I'm debating putting a Tial MVS gate on my o2 housing in attempt to be able to hold the gate completely closed under the assumption that exhaust pressure is stronger than the oem actuator spring. I run my wastegate duty cycle noid at 100% from 5000rpm up to redline, so the "boost control" is really only to set boost on the line and control the spike as the car launches.
Thanks for the tips, links and pics, nice work!
It's good to see I'm not the only one who thinks outside the box.
To help my turbo survive, the oil feed comes from the oil filter housing and the hose is routed behind the radiator fans for a little extra cooling. If the car is hot I'll let it idle with both fans on until the temps drop.
.Do you still use a restrictor inline running the oil from the housing? I had thought about putting a "T" in my oil cooler return to supply the turbo. I already removed the thermal actuator deal in the oil housing. So I should have full flow through there all the time.
I'm interested in those timing numbers as well! Do you keep timing flat lined during boost at 8* until 6k and then ramp back up quickly to peak 18* at 8K? How do your timing numbers progress from intial boost up to 6k?
I'm a firm believer in boost over timing myself. Currently I'm around 14* around 4500 and ramp up to 18* from there to 7k. I have some lite peppering on the plugs that scares me a bit. It's good to know great power is being made at such low timing! I was afraid to drop mine anymore.
A thing for most to understand is that FFTec Dyno is the stingiest Dyno this side of Buschurs and rumored to be worse. That car would have dyno'd 450awhp on any other MUSTANG dyno let alone Dynojet. Good numbers and it shows with the times...
Get those issues solved and go at it again. Whens the next visit to the track?
My timing map is set up so it constantly rises once above peak torque by one degree for every 500 rpm assuming torque (g/rev) stays the same. It's also set up so timing rises by roughly 1 degree for every 3psi of boost drop off. Timing is lowest at peak torque, which typically happens a few hundred rpm after reaching full boost. FYI I'm using E85. Pump gas timing would be much lower.