na90dsm
20+ Year Contributor
- 1,835
- 3
- Nov 10, 2002
-
nj,
New Jersey
200hp is do-able. im hoping for 300hp n/a with no nitrous on my setup im building now. gettin cams within the next 2 weeks
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
na90dsm said:200hp is do-able. im hoping for 300hp n/a with no nitrous on my setup im building now. gettin cams within the next 2 weeks

Are you serious? this is the most uneducated, unfounded, rediculously stupid post I've seen in a while. Do some research man the 420a puts out about 150 at the flywheel, were the hell did you get the hp rating of 110? Having you been reading too many honda tuning magazines? I mean seriously if you're gonna flame someone at least do some research first.
And btw 200hp from the 420a is very easy to attain with some time and tuning, I'd say you can do it for about $2000 if you do the work yourself.
200hp is do-able. im hoping for 300hp n/a with no nitrous on my setup im building now. gettin cams within the next 2 weeks
dustyb said:its 140 to the flywheel and 110 to the wheels. i had a few too many drinks that nite. anyways, i don't give a shit. you think you can obtain 200 hp out of $2000 bones if you do the work yourself. tell me, can you bore/balance/port/or dyno by yourself?
www.2gnt.com is all i have to say for you child.
all in all, 200 hp on a n/t is doable with thousands of dollars to burn like firewood, gallons of c16, and a few heads. 12.5:1 compression pistons KNOCK at idle running c16 gas. tell me, how are you going to get to THREE hundred HP? pushing the compression up to 15:1 on jet fuel? or you just gonna constantly keep on hooking up propane bottles? i have a 50 gallon drum that you might be able to compress some propane in......


its 140 to the flywheel and 110 to the wheels. i had a few too many drinks that nite. anyways, i don't give a shit. you think you can obtain 200 hp out of $2000 bones if you do the work yourself. tell me, can you bore/balance/port/or dyno by yourself?
Not to be an @ss but yes I can, not sure if you know or not but my dad owns a body shop so my family has a lot of connections who will do the work as a matter of a fact I can run on a dyno whenever I want and as far as the port/polish/balance/bore work I can get it done for free too. I actually just got a perfectly good 420a engine for free from having these connections, I'm sure you were unaware of this so I won't flame you for it
body shop works on BODY parts. Mecchanics shop works on MECHANICAL issues of cars. tell me, which one of your dad's do you have? how are you going to make enough displacement out of your car to make up for 90 whp? an f20 engine runs 12.5:1 compression, and has the best all-motor engine manufacturer (for a 4cyl) doing all the research and work, and are only pushing 210 to the wheels, ALL MOTOR. we're talking about a 30 THOUSAND dollar car.
dustyb said:body shop works on BODY parts. Mecchanics shop works on MECHANICAL issues of cars. tell me, which one of your dad's do you have? and i am being an ass
na90dsm said:yes oh yee of little faith. i talked to someone on here who knows peoepl at polk performance. they have all motor cam sets for the n/t 4g63 which im seeing about. well cam specs. he has a guy in texas running a 2.4L block with a 4g63 head, stock 64 bottom end with a 63 head makes 11:0:1 compression. he has these cams and all other mods to support and is a hair over 300hp.
Yep, put up or shut up. and if you put up, let me know how you did itdefrag010 said:Ok, here comes the thriller...
How many of you Own or have Seen With Your Own Eyes a 420A that dynoe'd 200+ whp without any poweradders (nitrous and turbo) ??????? Until you have, simply getting on here and saying higher compression with head flow work will magically give you 90whp just isn't going to do it. Real world Experience > all.

Thunderskull said:I think it's entirely possible to go 200-220ish to the wheels in a n/a 1g with significant mods. If the Honda boys are running 200+ hp with n/a 4bangers then the 4g63 shouldn't have too much trouble doing the same. This is especially true since we have a pretty decent head and intake right from the getgo. However, 300+ I think is pushing it a little unless you have crazy high compression, serious engineering, and are running on alcohol. Plus, you would have no low end to speak of. It would never be streetable. Many of the large displacement v8 engines are running 400hp with 10.5:1 compression. I can't see how a 4g64 bottom end with a 4g63 head and 11:1 compression can eeek out 300 horses even with other supporting mods. No cam in the world is going to make that happen.
Just remember that this post was about the 420a making 200 horse not the 4g-63. Nobody ever questions your motors ability. Only the bastard child gets razzed and questioned......it's because they fear us BWWAAAAHAHHAHAHAHA.......ok i'm doneThunderskull said:I think it's entirely possible to go 200-220ish to the wheels in a n/a 1g with significant mods. If the Honda boys are running 200+ hp with n/a 4bangers then the 4g63 shouldn't have too much trouble doing the same. This is especially true since we have a pretty decent head and intake right from the getgo. However, 300+ I think is pushing it a little unless you have crazy high compression, serious engineering, and are running on alcohol. Plus, you would have no low end to speak of. It would never be streetable. Many of the large displacement v8 engines are running 400hp with 10.5:1 compression. I can't see how a 4g64 bottom end with a 4g63 head and 11:1 compression can eeek out 300 horses even with other supporting mods. No cam in the world is going to make that happen.

Redmachine said:Just remember that this post was about the 420a making 200 horse not the 4g-63. Nobody ever questions your motors ability. Only the bastard child gets razzed and questioned......it's because they fear us BWWAAAAHAHHAHAHAHA.......ok i'm done
, yeah I know. It turned into a 4g63 post which I was replying to. At least you guys have a reliable turbo kit that works outa the box. We have turbo kits, but I get the impression they're a little more rinky dink than what hahn or star are putting out.na90dsm said:actually through all the stuff i read there are a few specs i liek about the 420a. has slightly higher compression, has a higher rocker arm ratio by a little bit, and actually has some goo dparts avalible for it in n/a trim.
i think the 420a in all honesty would hit 200-220 hp in a streetable form faster then the 4g63.

na90dsm said:not sure what your wowing but ill roll with it i guess. :laugh:
id actually liek to compare rod angles and such on the 420a vs the 4g63. who knows it may have a better angle also
I know somebody who saw somebody who was in NASA and they said they knew someone who could give them a rocket ship to the moon! But don't tell anyone, it's a secret that they only told meUnless it's proof of a stock displacement 420A 2nd gen breaking 200whp, you aren't proving shit.na90dsm said:ill post proof.
na90dsm said:when i get cam specs ill post em. and to dude 2 posts above me who posted his cam specs, there kinda small considering what im gnna run for all motor. all motor is completly different from a cam youd run in a turbo car.
Drarf, eh? Okay. Schnarf, schnarf. So educate me here. Call up one of these guys you know and ask how those lift numbers look at the same 1.75 of the Crower specs. I'm not going to pretend I know it all when it comes to that sort of math, but I'd guess that, when you raise that 1.55 to 1.75, your .472/.466 is going to get smaller.na90dsm said:here are the specs i gave ffwd to tell him this is where i wanna be abouts with my cams making up for the increase in rocker arm ratio on my build up. these drarf your cams
Gross Lift w/1.55
Int-.472 mid Exh-.466 mid
Just how small is what I'm curious.So now we're comparing Honda cams in a 4G63 in the 420A forum. You still having a hard time grasping why you're taking all this shit?na90dsm said:those are honda cams which run 1.55 rocker arm ratio. the 4g63 dsm runs a 1.7 ratio. the 420a runs a 1.75 rocker arm ratio. all that info is dirrectly posted on crowers website.
At least the rocker arm ratios were useful for a sense of comparisson. Although they mean nothing considering we're still all over the assembly line in terms of powerplants...Admirable goals in my eyes, however there is no car out there which can not be turbocharged. It's all in the tuning. Sure, you might only be able to run 1psi on such an engine before it knock, knock, knocks on heaven's door, but it would still be turbocharged. If you want to go all out and build the mother of all NA tuned 4G63 cars, then more power to you, but why do you persist in arguing your apple engine build in the orange forum? Not everyone sees thing the way you do, and as a predominately all motor guy, I can appreciate what you're saying. I'm just concerned that some new guy with a 2GNT is going to read what you're posting here about an all motor build and think he can drop in some HKS cams or, worse yet, Honda cams, and make 200-300whp. It's not going to happen. You drive a totally different car than we do. Arguing your all motor plans and specs in this forum is hardly different than having this discussion on a Nismo forum. Like arguing an all motor set up for a SR20 in a B15 forum. It only serves to confuse those who are not in the loop all the way.na90dsm said:were not talkin running cams to turbo your car later. wer talkin all motor cams,with no hopes of turbo.
Again. This is the 420A forum. Your specs and numbers are useless here. To make it worse, the other all motor 4G63 hopefuls who are browsing the 1G N/T forum here aren't likely going to see all this potentially useful information because you're sharing your research with the wrong crowd. It does not work for us and you're just confusing the hell out of new people. It's not right. Take your 4G63 all motor build and discuss it in all motor 4G63 land at the top of this forum, man.na90dsm said:ill post the specs on my cams when i get em. they will be (sic) all out dragrace 4g63 all motor cams

