JusMX141
Moderator
- 15,147
- 1,287
- Dec 13, 2005
-
Greensburg,
Pennsylvania
I had a set of Re-grind OEM cams here at my shop that came out of a customer's 1G when he upgraded to a set of Crower 64413's (272's).
I did a little comparing last night, and was shocked when I found that the lobe's total height on the Re-grind cams was .005-.007" LOWER than the stock cams that I had sitting here. Is this normal?
I know there are variations in lobe height between certain OEM cams depending on the number cast into them...the stock (uncut) cams had "A" cast into both the intake and exhaust, while the Regrinds had "I" on the intake and "B" on the exhaust. When compared to the brand new Crower cams, the lobes on the Crowers were about .003" taller than the stockers, while the regrinds were .005-.007" shorter than stock.
I was just concerned about how much this would effect overall performance. Obviously the lift and duration were altered as the car they came from had an aggressive idle, but is lobe height really that important?
I did a little comparing last night, and was shocked when I found that the lobe's total height on the Re-grind cams was .005-.007" LOWER than the stock cams that I had sitting here. Is this normal?
I know there are variations in lobe height between certain OEM cams depending on the number cast into them...the stock (uncut) cams had "A" cast into both the intake and exhaust, while the Regrinds had "I" on the intake and "B" on the exhaust. When compared to the brand new Crower cams, the lobes on the Crowers were about .003" taller than the stockers, while the regrinds were .005-.007" shorter than stock.
I was just concerned about how much this would effect overall performance. Obviously the lift and duration were altered as the car they came from had an aggressive idle, but is lobe height really that important?