steve
DSM Wiseman
- 17,218
- 3,876
- Feb 3, 2002
-
St. Charles,
Illinois
Nope, not unless you run a three stage Stutterbox and then only for the NLTS test.Defiant said:Um... the clutch isn't part of the ECU circuit, is it?
Steve
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Nope, not unless you run a three stage Stutterbox and then only for the NLTS test.Defiant said:Um... the clutch isn't part of the ECU circuit, is it?
So the fact that I have the stutterbox mod burned in my chip yet not actually wired wouldn't affect anything, would it?steve said:Nope, not unless you run a three stage Stutterbox and then only for the NLTS test.
Steve
Not sure I understand this one - can you explain.MNGSX said:Also if you have an optical CAS swap it for a hall effect.... I had better results with the hall effect one...
There are three types of cam angle sensor that are known to work. The early years (89-92) have a metal green/gray cover, use a flat rotating disk with slots, and an optical sensor. The later year sensor (93-94) has a black plastic cover, uses curved metal plates that rotate through a hall-effect sensor. The hall effect sensor is physically similar to the technology used in the 95-96 cam and crank sensors. Theoretically the hall effect sensor is higher resolution. They all work.
It wouldn't cause the problems your describing. Without the clutch wire connected to the Park-Neutral input the stutterbox and NLTS won't work. The pin is still grounded as it came, right?Ludachris said:So the fact that I have the stutterbox mod burned in my chip yet not actually wired wouldn't affect anything, would it?
Thanks for explaining. I'm running a brand new 3" MAF.MNGSX said:It reads timing events a little crisper... Ever see 2g swaps get misfire CEL's etc with swaps..?
The black lid has an output wave with sharper breaks. An HE sensor puts out 1's and 0's with less static...
http://www.roadraceengineering.com/1gcasin2g.htm
The black lid works the best... Mitsu would'nt change a part for nothing.
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
It's one place you can improve how well the ECU sees what is going on...
I'd try a different MAF too... What diameter are you running..?
Yeah, the mod wasn't performed at all - nothing was touched in that regard.steve said:It wouldn't cause the problems your describing. Without the clutch wire connected to the Park-Neutral input the stutterbox and NLTS won't work. The pin is still grounded as it came, right?
Steve

Yeah, a buddy of mine is a big LT1 guy and he suggested I leave the screens alone. I didn't take anything off of the MAF. It's brand new from FullThrottleSpeed.MNGSX said:Did you descreen the MAF or not?
The best place for info on problems with the sensor alone is a LS1 forum...
I know people who have had different experiences with the sensors. some put on aftermarket high flow ends, others descreen the stock ends.. With the LS1 cars they sometimes gain power but w/o the screen it can read lazy..
If you still have the honeycomb on it
on this one when I red your mod list... What do I win if I'm right?