BoxheadTim
10+ Year Contributor
- 38
- 0
- Jun 8, 2011
-
Gardnerville,
Nevada
First, I'd like to point out that I bought the car this way so the mods I know about are either based on what the PO told me or what I've found out in the meantime.
The relevant specs as far as I know are:
It's running what looks like a fairly basic map - ie, adjusted for the injector size, but ignition timing and injector settings are untouched otherwise as long as the engine parameters stay within the MAF clamp area.
I've got various issues with the car, namely knock on light load at certain revs, plus it runs rather hot under constant mild boost (5psi) uphill. I've seen water temps up to 245-250F on the data logger on a hot day (90F+) before I could pull over under these circumstances. Given that I live in the mountains, that's a bit of an issue.
Anyway, I'm trying to track down some of the issues in the hope of getting the car on the road before winter, otherwise I'd have to sell it and buy something that works
.
First question:
The car runs a 3" GM MAF instead of the OEM one. My understanding is that the OEM MAF needs the baro and IAT sensors to determine the correct airflow, whereas the GM MAF w/ MAF translator will keep the baro and IAT constant as its output doesn't need correcting for either. Or am I mistaken here? However my understanding is also that the ECU retards the timing for high IATs, does that mean a 'safe' map needs to take this into account and run some slightly retarded timing?
Second question:
From reading up on both the turbo and injector sizes, I have the suspicion that I have too much turbo for the injectors I have. This might explain why the boost is currently capped at 14.6psi and TBH for the intended use of the car (daily driver with some track/HPDE use during the summer) I don't necessarily need the big numbers that you can get with an FP Green. I also don't need to blow up the engine, either. So, would anybody want to comment on the size of the injectors in relation to the size of the turbo?
Third question:
The GM MAF is currently in the position of the stock MAF, where its connector vies for space with the coolant overflow tank. Am I correct that this is not necessarily the best or only position for it and I could move further down the intake (ie between the FMIC and the throttlebody) without any negative effects?
The relevant specs as far as I know are:
- FP Green "spec" turbo (I have a suspicion that it's not an original FP one as it doesn't have the FP plaque on the compressor housing, but I might be wrong here)
- 660cc injectors (make unknown) running at approx 42psi (the fuel pressure gauge has a major case of the shakes between 40psi and 45psi when the engine is running, I assume because it's not damped).
- Large FMIC
- Fluiddyne radiator with one 12" and one 11" fan
- ECMLink v3
- Modded (OEM or Evo 3) exhaust manifold (someone welded a wastegate connector directly to the manifold)
- 3" downpipe and exhaust
It's running what looks like a fairly basic map - ie, adjusted for the injector size, but ignition timing and injector settings are untouched otherwise as long as the engine parameters stay within the MAF clamp area.
I've got various issues with the car, namely knock on light load at certain revs, plus it runs rather hot under constant mild boost (5psi) uphill. I've seen water temps up to 245-250F on the data logger on a hot day (90F+) before I could pull over under these circumstances. Given that I live in the mountains, that's a bit of an issue.
Anyway, I'm trying to track down some of the issues in the hope of getting the car on the road before winter, otherwise I'd have to sell it and buy something that works
.First question:
The car runs a 3" GM MAF instead of the OEM one. My understanding is that the OEM MAF needs the baro and IAT sensors to determine the correct airflow, whereas the GM MAF w/ MAF translator will keep the baro and IAT constant as its output doesn't need correcting for either. Or am I mistaken here? However my understanding is also that the ECU retards the timing for high IATs, does that mean a 'safe' map needs to take this into account and run some slightly retarded timing?
Second question:
From reading up on both the turbo and injector sizes, I have the suspicion that I have too much turbo for the injectors I have. This might explain why the boost is currently capped at 14.6psi and TBH for the intended use of the car (daily driver with some track/HPDE use during the summer) I don't necessarily need the big numbers that you can get with an FP Green. I also don't need to blow up the engine, either. So, would anybody want to comment on the size of the injectors in relation to the size of the turbo?
Third question:
The GM MAF is currently in the position of the stock MAF, where its connector vies for space with the coolant overflow tank. Am I correct that this is not necessarily the best or only position for it and I could move further down the intake (ie between the FMIC and the throttlebody) without any negative effects?
but good luck with the car welcome to dsmtuners!