- 2,609
- 35
- Dec 17, 2004
-
East Hampton,
Connecticut
Cool start. I believe that this is for NA aplication? You are staying true to your original plenum design, correct? You are going to angle down the opposite side of the plenum?
And I'm glad that you changed your design inside the plenum with the "extruding" velocity stacks. I disagree with that design for a few different reasons (I'm aware that it is being used out there on some 4g63 aftermarket intakes. I still don't agree with its design). Though I believe that you should absolutely have a velocity stack entrance on the floor to each runner (or at least be as smooth as possible on the entrance to the runner. It should be a smooth waterfall, not an abrupt 90*). So obviously, in order to do that, you would need to open her up to get to that connection.
As for the angle of entry into the head; if you look at the Venom intake (or its knock off OBX intake) you will see that they also give the runner air flow a slight angle of entry (obviously over a longer distance).
Any chance you know what your plenum volume is going to end up to be?
Good start
MB
Edit in: as I re-read, I see you are talking about low boost. By the size of it, I could see low boost or NA use on this. Be aware that your "theory flows" (for lack of a better term,
) seem to be based on drawing the air in and not forcing it in (correct?). In my opinion, there is a difference between drawing air in and forcing it in, but obviously, you are just using the "flows" as a starting point.
As for the angle of the TB; I'm not sure I'm there yet. I'm wondering if you end up feeding the #4 cylinder better and starving the #1 cylinder more. Just food for thought.
And I'm glad that you changed your design inside the plenum with the "extruding" velocity stacks. I disagree with that design for a few different reasons (I'm aware that it is being used out there on some 4g63 aftermarket intakes. I still don't agree with its design). Though I believe that you should absolutely have a velocity stack entrance on the floor to each runner (or at least be as smooth as possible on the entrance to the runner. It should be a smooth waterfall, not an abrupt 90*). So obviously, in order to do that, you would need to open her up to get to that connection.
As for the angle of entry into the head; if you look at the Venom intake (or its knock off OBX intake) you will see that they also give the runner air flow a slight angle of entry (obviously over a longer distance).
Any chance you know what your plenum volume is going to end up to be?
Good start
MB
Edit in: as I re-read, I see you are talking about low boost. By the size of it, I could see low boost or NA use on this. Be aware that your "theory flows" (for lack of a better term,
) seem to be based on drawing the air in and not forcing it in (correct?). In my opinion, there is a difference between drawing air in and forcing it in, but obviously, you are just using the "flows" as a starting point.As for the angle of the TB; I'm not sure I'm there yet. I'm wondering if you end up feeding the #4 cylinder better and starving the #1 cylinder more. Just food for thought.
. They are strong tho and in the end that is all that matters right