The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Evo3 center differential

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

While I'm not jtmcinder (meaning I don't have his knowledge base), I'll chime in with my input.

Short answer is the car will behave and handle more like a RWD car and will therefore be more inclined to oversteer. This will make the car easier to point in the right direction based on steering using the throttle inputs.
 
If a welded "50/50" center diff goes from 0-100 to 100-0 from one instant to the next (depending on traction). So then what happens to the 35/65 center diff when it looses traction on one set of wheels?
Same thing as any other diff: if there's no limited-slip device, the power goes to the end with less traction.

I'm confused as to why a 50/50 split is less desired than say 35/65 that was stated above? jtmcinder care to chime in?
For straight-ahead traction, you want the torque split to match the weight. A good launch probably gets at least 65% of the weight onto the rear. Also, for rotating the car at lowish speeds, nothing is as fun as power oversteer.

As for the 35/65 I'd imagine it'd behave just like any worthwhile LSD would. It'll either out and out lock 35/65 and wont care (clutch type) or it'll send 65 to the front and 35 to the rear based on optimal traction conditions (Quaiffe type). If it were open... umm well I dunno if you can torque bias with an open that well. That's outta my league. I'd most likely say that it'd be a clutch type and therefore should just always be 35/65ish.
What a fascinating post. First off, a 35/65 is a planetary diff, so it has no built-in limited-slip. You have to add a piggy-pack, such as a VC or a electronic clutch. Second, I have no idea why it would ever switch to being 65/35, in particular. I suppose that might be true for a random moment if the piggy-back LSD were at least partially locked and the fronts had more grip, but it would a very rare moment. Third, you cannot use helicals in a planetary, so drop the whole Quaife-35/65 idea. Lastly, as suggested above, a planetary is always open. A limited-slip device must be piggy-backed onto it. Read the FAQs at the top of the forum to see how they work.

- Jtoby
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top