The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

1G Engine Blueprint Data Check - Main Journal Oil Clearances and path forward

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

athlete3344

15+ Year Contributor
408
71
May 1, 2010
Tampa, Florida
Good evening,

Im currently in the process of blueprinting my block, and Ive finished up the main journal oil clearances. Goal for now is to support a 20g and have a fun to drive car. Based on the data, I do have a few questions:
  • Overall, things look great, but Im wondering if I should be picky about #4, 3, and 2 oil clearances? I dont mind spending a little extra on a line hone if its worth it w/ the above goals in mind.
    • Plastigauge and dial bore mostly agree on taper for #4. I do think my dial bore/mic error is in the 0.0005 range, so the difference make sense. Also for #4 and #3 the plastigauge was just a hair outside the 0.0020 range.
  • Is it normal for these bearings to be egg shaped? I saw this mentioned in a Jafro video but wanted to double check.
  • Other machine work Im looking to include is a bore/hone for new pistons, fitting 1g rods to new pistons, deck, cleaning/hot tank, and crankshaft galley ball removal (maybe rod work depending on clearances but Im expecting them to be spot on). Is there anything else I should be asking for to get the block ready to start my build?


y = vertical main measurement (parallel to cylinder)
x = horizontal main measurement (other way to cylinder)
oil clearances w/ new acl bearings
5​
4​
3​
2​
1​
y1
0.0025​
0.0024​
0.0019​
0.0024​
0.0023​
y2
0.0025​
0.0024​
0.0018​
0.0026​
0.0024​
x1
0.0034​
0.0031​
0.0032​
0.0031​
0.0030​
x2
0.0033​
0.0031​
0.0030​
0.0032​
0.0027​
plastigauge0.0020, no taper0.0018-0.0019, no taper0.0019, no tapersome slight taper 0.0018 <-> 0.00190.0020, no taper


Also for fun I grabbed some measurements with the original bearings. Looks like #3 was still showing some taper, and maybe #2 and #1 were wearing a little faster. #5 and #4 look to be pretty close to the new ACL bearing measurements above. Also egging was a bit worse in #3, 2, and 1.
oil clearances, original bearings
5​
4​
3​
2​
1​
y1
0.0026​
0.0025​
0.0025​
0.0029​
0.0027​
y2
0.0028​
0.0025​
0.0023​
0.0029​
0.0029​
x1
0.003​
0.0029​
0.0037​
0.0041​
0.004​
x2
0.0029​
0.0031​
0.0034​
0.004​
0.0039​
 
Figured I should follow up with rod oil clearances as well. I think these are going to be a big on a loose side (Im betting #4 is closer to 1/2/3) and Im leaning towards ordering an oversized bearing and having the shop open up the rods to get closer to 0.0022 for the clearances. Does this make sense or should I go with looser than 0.0022 for rod oil clearances?

rod oil clearances4321
y10.00190.00260.00270.0024
y20.00220.00260.00260.0024
x10.00460.00460.00340.0047
x20.00460.00460.00210.0043


I want to make sure I get everything done at the machine shop in 1 stop if possible. Heres the current list of things I have:
  • Check main oil clearances and hone/polish if needed, target 0.0022
  • Replace STD ACL rod bearings with 0.001 oversized, hone/polish to 0.0022
  • Bore cylinders to 85.5mm pistons, target 0.0035-0.0040 PTW
  • Rings gaps top = 0.020, bottom = 0.024
  • The crank is basically perfect, should it just be cleaned or should I have it polished?
  • Should the rotating assembly be balance?
  • Hot tank, surface deck - anything else?
 
Here, you need one of these.
Print and fill out EVERYTHING you measure. Then you have a "Blueprint Sheet".✌️
Pops


You must be logged in to view this image or video.



You must be logged in to view this image or video.
 

Attachments

You must be registered for see attachments list
Last edited:
Oversized bearings will make your oil clearance larger. Undersized bearings will make them tighter.
 
Youre right, I definitely had that backwards and Im glad I didnt order anything else yet.

I actually decided to take a big step back since I wasnt too confident with my measurements and the time between measurements (crank was taken over a year ago when I was just learning to use mics). Ended up buying an ultra sonic cleaner for the head, and tossed a couple sets of 1g rods in there to too. Going to remeasure crank, rods, and check w/ plastigauge again. I may end up just getting a set of Eagle rods and call it a day.
 
Add Value - Be Respectful - No Trolling - No Misinformation - Participate Often!
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top