Comparison of Fp3065 vs Sc6169sp

[javier347]

Well I have both setup and would like 2 know wich turbo gives more power. I believe I've read that the sc6169 is similar to a gt35. I just want some inputs on what turbo 2 keep. the fp only has bout 2k miles and the sc6169 bout 800 miles and consist of sp cover with a 63 hotside. I'm not to worried bout spool so we could rule that out but I would appreciate any input. Thank

 

[dsm-onster]

The PTE turbo flows LOTS more by far. The fp turbo has a gt30r turbine wheel. The 6169 has a larger turbine wheel than the FP35** series turbo chargers. You said SC not SCM so I assume the turbine housign of the PTE is a .63 a/r garrett housing. This also should provide a little better flow than the bolton fp turbine housing (although the fp housing is so good, that can be debated).

The FP is a gt35/gt30 hybrid with a bolton housing. . .

 

[TurboAnything]

The 3065 will be a better turbo by far. The FP mitsu housing is designed to replicate a true GT-R exhaust housing and they both have the same compressor wheel. And the 3065 is a true GT-R turbo ball bearing center section and low pressure exhaust wheel.

 

[dsm-onster]

There's no way in hell an fp3065 flows as much as a gt35r. And the PTE 6169 has a turbine wheel larger than the gt35r, which is a whole frame size bigger than the fp3065. The PTE turbo comes with a real garrett housing. It flows more by far. There's lots more to a turbo than a compressor wheel and turbine housing.

 

[Black99gst]

subscribed. interested in this show down. good information guys keep it coming

 

[JEFFREYCASTGSX]

Truthfully, that FP is a lesser flowing, faster spooling, the sc is a bigger(more flowing) slower spooling turbo. You pick which one you want.

 

[DSM_PWR]

Instead of having us guessing around... why not install both and show us the comparisson ...

Either way, i'd choose the 3065 any day...

 

[JusMX141]

The journal bearing PTE SC6169SP may flow more air, but it'll puke it's guts before you ever reach the point where it'll make more airflow than a FP 3065.

http://www.dsmtuners.com/forums/turbo-system-tech/344931-whats-deal-garrett-t3-thrust-plates.html



I'd choose the 3065. It'll fit a DSM-flanged manifold, and doesn't have Garrett's thrust plates and journal bearings that will eventually fail.

 

[javier347]

Well ill be keeping the t3 sc6169. Ill be tunning it for round 25 to 30 pounds. Ill keep you guys posted.