The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

93 tsi 15-100mph pull 15psi

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Status
Not open for further replies.
My car seems faster than that. Id have to do the same thing and find out. Mods are in my profile.
 
Does this guy remind anyone else of bensbaby? LOL
 
does this guy remind anyone else of bensbaby? Lol

awwwww shuuuttt down

## al just jealous cus u cn't say nice cas ben since i haf a storker 2.35l w. nos powershot

awwwwwwww

.
.
.
.

On a more serious note, way way back in the day (and it was a cold ass day) one of my old 1Gs put down 249fwhp/258fwtq on a ported 14B @ 16psi completely stock with cat-delete, 560's and S-AFC.

You must be logged in to view this image or video.


I think it was in the mid 30*F and the dyno was 650' above sea level.
 
awwwww shuuuttt down

## al just jealous cus i haf a storker 2.35l w. nos powershot

awwwwwwww

.
.
.
.

On a more serious note, way way back in the day (and it was a cold ass day) one of my old 1Gs put down 249fwhp/258fwtq on a ported 14B @ 16psi on a stock exhaust with cat-delete and S-AFC.

I think it was in the mid 30*F and the dyno was 650' above sea level.


I wish you could see how hard I'm laughing.ROFLROFLROFL

1g dsm 500hp bensbaby my 2 cars awd 450hp - YouTube

Needless to say his "500 hp" runs mid 13's haha
 
I just dont know why people are giving me trouble? I raced 300hp mustang and got him by 4 cars.. Im not saying 300whp is alot... just simplely stating mods "which are in the utube info" and how the car ran? Its not about whos faster.. And the car is nooo where near stock speed. I will do a 0-150mph pull for u guys wed.
 
Because that mustang is making 300HP SAE Net at the flywheel not the ground, and is a general pig of an automobile.

You are not making 300whp @ 15psi untuned on 2.0L with stock cams, redline, intake and exhaust manifolds. Even using a Ported E3-16G sprinkled with Curt Brown's fairy dust.. unless you live in antartica and this pull was done below sealevel at -40*F.

Please do not do 150mph on a public road.
 
I just dont know why people are giving me trouble? I raced 300hp mustang and got him by 4 cars.. Im not saying 300whp is alot... just simplely stating mods "which are in the utube info" and how the car ran? Its not about whos faster.. And the car is nooo where near stock speed. I will do a 0-150mph pull for u guys wed.


God no. Dont do that. I'll just agree with you so you feel good about yourself. I dont get how you can sit here and argue with people that have done this way longer than you and done an actual dyno proven 300 hp run. Your car isnt that fast man. Its base power.

You're acting like this guy. (note the time he clocked)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=485oc38ppAM
 
God no. Dont do that. I'll just agree with you so you feel good about yourself. I dont get how you can sit here and argue with people that have done this way longer than you and done an actual dyno proven 300 hp run. Your car isnt that fast man. Its base power.

No kidding, I posted a dyno graph from a FWD with a tune on a cold day at sealevel and slightly more boost showing 250whp, where in the world does he think he's getting the extra 50whp? This was on a dynojet, no less...

In case you missed it the first time:

249fwhp/258fwtq on a ported 14B @ 16psi completely stock with cat-delete, 560's and S-AFC.
You must be logged in to view this image or video.

mid 30*F and the dyno was 650' above sea level.

We're not giving you trouble we are giving you reality based on actual experience and understanding.

Chill dude, research and improve. But most importantly please do not endanger other people in the process.
 
God no. Dont do that. I'll just agree with you so you feel good about yourself. I dont get how you can sit here and argue with people that have done this way longer than you and done an actual dyno proven 300 hp run. Your car isnt that fast man. Its base power.

Agreed^
Have fun...ending up 6ft under trying to prove something that states itself in the vid :ohdamn:
 
They only thing i can do is dyno and upgrade i guess...

Landspeed are u even lOoking at my supporting mods!!!!??! I have more mods. Jesus dude, wake up!
 
What sort of "tunable" computer do you have?

You may just need some fuel mods, like injectors and potentially an adjustable regulator. Then tune for more boost.

I would thoroughly research as you go ofcourse, there is a bit of a learning curve. Especially if the tunable computer you have is ECMLink, which all in all is very user friendly.

The forum, which is full of brilliant folks, doesn't take kindly to people getting on day one and starting barely legible threads full of questions that should've been researched and then getting belligerent when answers received are not what you wanted/expected...

Also, stick with the same dyno to track progress as you go, every one will read different. Keep track of weather and altitude density as well to help understand your results.

Edit: What mods? Where? All you have listed is an exhaust, fuel pump and stock injectors.

Go be an ignorant, illiterate prick somewhere else. I don't even know why I took the time to spell all this out for you. I all but broke out the crayons here.
 
They only thing i can do is dyno and upgrade i guess...

Landspeed are u even lOoking at my supporting mods!!!!??! I have more mods. Jesus dude, wake up!

Yea but...hes tuned at 16 and your untuned at 15. Plus hes a true fwd(which will dyno higher then an awd) and its on a dynojet. It probably would only have made 225 or something on a mustang dyno. So honestly you could be making less then that run. A far cry from 300whp.
 
Yea but...hes tuned at 16 and your untuned at 15. Plus hes a true fwd(which will dyno higher then an awd) and its on a dynojet. It probably would only have made 225 or something on a mustang dyno. So honestly you could be making less then that run. A far cry from 300whp.

I want to point out that this was an old setup (that car has since been sold) I posted up from many years and many setups past. I am currently on a 71mm HX52 Pro and for next season am aiming for just shy of three times what this guy wishes he had.

I run more boost than this kid runs fuel pressure.
 
I have 16g evo 3 turbo, that is considered a big 16g,15psi,3 inch turbo back, noo cat, k&n filter,new side mt intercooler STOCK,3 inch intercooler piping,gm maft with translator, SAFC2,450cc injectors with a 255 walli,forge bov, stock mani and internals, no tune "meaning dyno tune" i have 2 maps, one at 15 one at 23psi, at 15psi im sure i make atleast 300whp bro..
 
I want to point out that this was an old setup I posted up, I am currently on a 71mm HX52 Pro and aiming for just shy of 900whp.

I run more boost than this guy runs fuel pressure.

Yea sorry that was in no way an attempt to discredit your set up. Those were actually very respectable numbers for such a simple set up.

It was just a comparison as he said his extra bolts on should have netted him more power then yours. I was just trying to point out a realistic range his car would be in.
 
Learn your place landspeed and stop being a ####ing troll
 
Id like to know how you think it picked up 100hp?

The 14b flows something like 405cfm at 15psi, the 16g about 500-515cfm at 15psi. The difference would be "about" 6whp difference.

Theres a recent thread on a guy who dyno'd a tuned 14b at 15psi at around 230whp.

So an educated guess would put this guy at 236-240whp if he were tuned which hes not, so 230whp is being rather generous.

Because he said he was running a evo3 16g and not a small 16g. I am not trying to argue either way. Small 16g 505cfm and evo3 550 cfm at 15 psi. That is more than 6 hp. There are a lot of variables in play. Since he is running a maft, he does not have quite the restriction on the intake side that he had running a 1g or 2g sensor. I am not saying he DEFINATELY has 250+ to the wheels, I was just giving a ball park figure.

I can tell you that my small 16 put down 265 with a so-so tune, here in Atlanta and can call them and have them email me the dyno if you want although it should not be needed and I run a stock head but, I have all the supporting mods. The same holds true with my laser running a maft.

We can throw around numbers all day long and it means nothing until he puts it on a dyno and sees what he has. His whp may not be 260 or so but, I will bet it is relatively close based on the video. An evo 3 does about 10% more flow at 15psi and if he had just 230, he would now have around 250, depending on other variables. The biggest restriction he is going to have currently is the injectors as they are not going to be able to do 300hp to the wheels. He could very well have 250 give or take about 10%. When I reread his mods, I added that it would not be 300 due to the injectors as I thought he had larger injectors and he did not.

I still say, put the thing on a dyno and don't worry about it. It puts down what it puts down. I gave him a little extra but not as much as some seem to think I have. One way to find out.

If I am wrong on this, I am wrong. I will still sleep at night. I got my numbers from my own dealings and tuning with maft and my talon with a Greddy. I know what mine put down and if you do not believe me, won't hurt my feelings one bit. If I had to guess, I would say around 250 for the car in the video.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have 16g evo 3 turbo, that is considered a big 16g,15psi,3 inch turbo back, noo cat, k&n filter,new side mt intercooler STOCK,3 inch intercooler piping,gm maft with translator, SAFC2,450cc injectors with a 255 walli,forge bov, stock mani and internals, no tune "meaning dyno tune" i have 2 maps, one at 15 one at 23psi, at 15psi im sure i make atleast 300whp bro..

No bro, at 15psi on that turbo, you will not. Unless you got some NAWS in there. LOL

How the hell do you intend to run 23psi on 450cc injectors?

Breaking in a new motor last year on the rusty trusty 14b I keep handy for such things, I had the wastegate flapper stick one night, boost spiked to 21-22psi and my 450's logged 118% IDCs

Tell me this is a troll and people are not really this stupid. :banghead:
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I have 16g evo 3 turbo, that is considered a big 16g,15psi,3 inch turbo back, noo cat, k&n filter,new side mt intercooler STOCK,3 inch intercooler piping,gm maft with translator, SAFC2,450cc injectors with a 255 walli,forge bov, stock mani and internals, no tune "meaning dyno tune" i have 2 maps, one at 15 one at 23psi, at 15psi im sure i make atleast 300whp bro..

I just have this strange hinkering that you are lying.

If you had this, you would have mentioned it earlier but instead you chose to defend how you had almost stock eveything.:shhh:
 
Also i dont wish for 900hp, im looking for 400whp..im a student at uti my dd is a sentra spec v.. I love cars. And cant stand prople trolling on something u put hrs building... Give me a break for god sake..and give credit where credit is due
 
Also i dont wish for 900hp, im looking for 400whp..im a student at uti my dd is a sentra spec v.. I love cars. And cant stand prople trolling on something u put hrs building... Give me a break for god sake..and give credit where credit is due

I'll give you credit for taking an extra 3 seconds to attempt punctuation on this post. Most, if not all here have been or currently are at the stage you sit at now.

Nearly all of us have blood and sweat in the car, but that doesn't magically make it faster. You are allowed to have pride in your car, but don't make shit up.

Somethings are a physical impossibility. And on a Stock FPR with 450s.. 300whp is an impossibility. Thats more than 30lbs/min mass flow, not gonna happen on 450s at stock BFP.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top