lowell
15+ Year Contributor
- 320
- 21
- Apr 6, 2006
-
vancouver,
BC, Canada
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
And for reference, a stock 4th gen Viper on our dyno:
You must be logged in to view this image or video.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.
Those are great numbers. Great job. I am not sure if I am seeing or reading the dyno right.. Did you make 474HP/413TQ with the Comp 100's and then 494HP/300TQ with the HKS 272's? Was the drop in torque worth the gain in horsepower in your opinion? How does the car feel after the swap?
its looks like 388 to me....?
Agreed. Nice peak numbers for a 50 trim, but I would venture to say from the graph that the first run (the comp 100's) would be a better match for the 50 trim than the second run. Looking at power under the curve and peak torque, I would want to shift her right around 7k range (depending on gear) and then she would fall back into the peak torque area with power coming in strong.So the HKS's gained HP but lost TQ, makes sense, larger cam=shift to the right.
Agreed. Nice peak numbers for a 50 trim, but I would venture to say from the graph that the first run (the comp 100's) would be a better match for the 50 trim than the second run. Looking at power under the curve and peak torque, I would want to shift her right around 7k range (depending on gear) and then she would fall back into the peak torque area with power coming in strong.
Interesting comaprison though. Thanks OP. I always like to see these things.
MB