The Central Hub for DSM Community and Information

For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.

Recomend me Some Cams

This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

Status
Not open for further replies.
Wow, you are a grade "A" asshole. Why do you treat people like inferiors, including the origional author of this post?

Sorry, but money doesn't buy you speed up here. The fastest DSM around these parts is Dave Landy's red 1G, (the guy who first wire DSMLink into a 1G), and he runs low 12's trapping 115-118. This was maxing out his 8cm red from FP at 30psi dropping to 27. He is also the founder of RMDSM.

His brother Hal invented the code for DSMLink to be run on a palm pilot......you look like a damn fool compared to these guys, so yes, the general population at RMDSM is so much more knowledgable about the 4g63 than you it isn't even a comparison.

Like I said before, you obviosly aren't stupid around a DSM, but why act like such a bi***? Mommy should have taught you some manners and told you not to be so damn smug. You should get the shit kicked out of you so you aren't so damn cocky.



"but to what!?! noone knows. thats why its rediculous for you to tell him what cams to get. cam choice is based on turbo and type of driving. you know neither of those"
Capitol letters are nice at the beginning of sentences! It doesn't matter if he is upgrading to a small 16G or a 60-1.....spool time will be minimized with the 264s. The top end difference is insignificant compared to the loss of low-end torque.


I will say it again: with the information given, the 264/264 combo is best suited for his needs. Like the AMS article shows, the 272 cams don't show gains untill way high in the rev range---A well designed IM would more than make up for the lost top by shifting the torque curve end while, still retaining the good low-end. Give me a better scenario, I'd like to hear one.

Your post about mommy buying parts is so incomprehensive and childish, I don't even know how to reply to such an ignorant, stupid-ass comment. You make me feel like I am in middle school again. Please, don't be such a prick. You and your attitude are a great example of one of the reasons this forum is going to crap.



I don't want to post on this anymore, I feel this guy hasn't gotten any help here. I don't care if it was because of me, or you; the fact is this man didn't recive what he came here for-just a little help. Let's stop the arguing and let the space be used for something good instead of all this non-constructive bickering.
 
KeltonDSMer said:
Wow, you are a grade "A" asshole. Why do you treat people like inferiors, including the origional author of this post?

Sorry, but money doesn't buy you speed up here. The fastest DSM around these parts is Dave Landy's red 1G, (the guy who first wire DSMLink into a 1G), and he runs low 12's trapping 115-118. This was maxing out his 8cm red from FP at 30psi dropping to 27. He is also the founder of RMDSM.

His brother Hal invented the code for DSMLink to be run on a palm pilot......you look like a damn fool compared to these guys, so yes, the general population at RMDSM is so much more knowledgable about the 4g63 than you it isn't even a comparison.

Like I said before, you obviosly aren't stupid around a DSM, but why act like such a bi***? Mommy should have taught you some manners and told you not to be so damn smug. You should get the shit kicked out of you so you aren't so damn cocky.



"but to what!?! noone knows. thats why its rediculous for you to tell him what cams to get. cam choice is based on turbo and type of driving. you know neither of those"
Capitol letters are nice at the beginning of sentences! It doesn't matter if he is upgrading to a small 16G or a 60-1.....spool time will be minimized with the 264s. The top end difference is insignificant compared to the loss of low-end torque.


I will say it again: with the information given, the 264/264 combo is best suited for his needs. Like the AMS article shows, the 272 cams don't show gains untill way high in the rev range---A well designed IM would more than make up for the lost top by shifting the torque curve end while, still retaining the good low-end. Give me a better scenario, I'd like to hear one.

Your post about mommy buying parts is so incomprehensive and childish, I don't even know how to reply to such an ignorant, stupid-ass comment. You make me feel like I am in middle school again. Please, don't be such a prick. You and your attitude are a great example of one of the reasons this forum is going to crap.



I don't want to post on this anymore, I feel this guy hasn't gotten any help here. I don't care if it was because of me, or you; the fact is this man didn't recive what he came here for-just a little help. Let's stop the arguing and let the space be used for something good instead of all this non-constructive bickering.

As much as I agree, please dont fuel him. Well he wont be able to reply to you anyway, so oh well.
 
Im just gonna close this thread, to the original poster I hope you got the info you needed. But if not by all means feel free to repost your question. This thread is too far offtopic.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Support Vendors who Support the DSM Community

Build Thread Updates

Latest Classifieds

Back
Top