ilco187
10+ Year Contributor
- 1,706
- 7
- Jan 3, 2009
-
Niles,
Michigan
im stuck on both, its a hard decision to pick just one. 
but they GOTTA be turbo, n/t's are just junk to me.

but they GOTTA be turbo, n/t's are just junk to me.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
For 1990-1999 Mitsubishi Eclipse, Eagle Talon, Plymouth Laser, and Galant VR-4 Owners. This is where the DSM platform history is documented and archived. Log in to help us in our mission, and to remove most ads from the browsing experience.
This site may earn a commission from merchant affiliate links, including eBay, Amazon, and others.

jk
The 2g's only better because of its looks.

I don't think they look all that great! And they are not as fun to drive as a 1g.
I also dont care for the 12" shifter.
im stuck on both, its a hard decision to pick just one.
but they GOTTA be turbo, n/t's are just junk to me.

...Now ya see the arguments have just been over which generation is better.. but then you gotta go and say something like that

Where is the Honda choice???
jk
I'm biased since I own a 2g, but I wouldn't mind a clean 1g!

for men who drive uglier cars because 2g's are "chick cars" 
"I do not think it means what you think it means. "your an idot.