Next step. Wideband or DSMlink?

[daren_p]

DSMlink is easier than an AFC to tune with and unlike the S-AFC, there is a fantastic support group for DSMlink.
Where else can you post a log of your car and have it reviewed by people who are fairly expert at DSM tuning? That my friend is cool. Say you are having an issue and post a question. One of the first responces on the DSMlink forum will be "post a log." Often, you'll be directed to log specific functions that relate to your problem. Instead of us trying to figure out your problem based on a vague description, were able to review a log of sensor data and focus on what's going on.
This is the best investment I have ever made in the car.

I agree, Dsmlink may have alot more functions, but anyone can tune with this, its almost idiot proof ! & the support is fantastic if you ever run into any problems.

 

[peregrine]

dsmlink is the way to go first. forget the afc. why "fool" your ecu when you can actually control it? get the dsmlink then get your wideband and have incredible tuning potential at your fingertips.

 

[MNGSX]

I agree, Dsmlink may have alot more functions, but anyone can tune with this, its almost idiot proof ! & the support is fantastic if you ever run into any problems.

Its simple and it works...

I still pretter sure it wont run closed loop 02 at WOT etc like a full standalone...

I'm also pretty sure i cant increase the cold start enrich for my 85% alcohol with it as well...

Its big bang for the buck but things like the AEM once mastered are wicked tuning tools...

You can control so many things in so many ways....